If you have any questions geared towards me, address them here.
Okay, I'll bite. Here's your chance to answer some of my doubts.
I think it's safe to say you've proven to be a bit of a polarizing figure. At the same time, you call for a USA NT that is more open to conversation outside of those from within an inner circle. To me, there seems to be some disjoint between your words and your actions.
You mentioned your time back in III.12 last season. I don't think you gained too many supporters from your time there, and you stated in your speech in this forum that you decided to be the league's heel because a PL member suggested it. What this seemed to show was a blatant disrespect for those below DII, and you even stated that you were amused by dropping down.
At the same time, you seem to indicate that you would reject assistance and/or input from those tied to the current "regime." While you state that this is due to a history of underachieving at the current level, it still goes against the message of inclusion and openness.
Basically, what it boils down to is this: your game management and tactical decision-making aren't really in question. But how can we believe you when you say that you'll reach out to users in lower divisions and look for more input from users in the country when you have shown a greater history of being influenced to become the enemy of your league and being so quick to antagonize anyone who has provided input with past NT decisions?