BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > Small Forwards

Small Forwards

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
141372.1
Date: 4/20/2010 1:02:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Everyone always says SFs are more difficult to train, which is obvious if you are trying for a well-rounded player because there are more skills to train. What would this community say makes a pretty ideal, yet realistic SF? Of course, this will vary greatly by division and personal preference. Still, I figured it would be a good talking point since I haven't really seen this discussed.

My ideal, but realistic SF:

JS/JR/IS: Proficient to Prominent
HN/DR/PA: Respectable to Proficient
OD/ID: Proficient to Prominent
RB: Strong+
SB: Who cares

I am only Div IV, so I have considered a player who would succeed at that level. Thoughts?

This Post:
00
141372.2 in reply to 141372.1
Date: 4/20/2010 1:09:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
SF's can be built in two ways inside weighted or outside weighted.

My ideal Outside Weighted.
JS 15 JR10
OD 14 HA 10
DR 12 PA 10
IS 10 ID 12
RB 10 SB 8

Would take a while to create but something roughly along those lines would be effective

From: brian

This Post:
00
141372.3 in reply to 141372.2
Date: 4/20/2010 1:38:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I use to have an extremely effective SF that was:

JS 16 JR 8
OD 11 HA 11
DR 11 PA 4
IS 13 ID 8
RB 6 SB 7

Having someone that can attack inside and outside was great. Ended up moving him cause he was capped and really wanted to replace him with someone that had better JR, OD and PA. Some extra RB would have been nice too.

Another guy i had and trained semi-successfully for a few seasons was:

JS 7 JR 4
OD 10 HA 5
DR 8 PA 8
IS 14 ID 12
RB 12 SB 8

Got him with 7 OD, he was short and hoped to have him much higher then what he had in OD/HA/DR/PA but the all-star potential eventually bit him too. Sold off after the GE update a few seasons ago which put more emphasis on guard skills at SF.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt