BuzzerBeater Forums

I have two PGs and I can't figure it out who is more suitable for my starting PG.

The first one has better skills shown as below but mediocre game shape:
Player One:
Weekly salary: $ 10 124
DMI: 18000
Age: 25
Game Shape: mediocre
Jump Shot: strong Jump Range: respectable
Outside Def.: proficient Handling: proficient
Driving: strong Passing: strong
Inside Shot: atrocious Inside Def.: mediocre
Rebounding: awful Shot Blocking: atrocious
Stamina: respectable Free Throw: atrocious

The other is not as good as the former but has strong game shape:
Player Two:
Weekly salary: $ 5 630
DMI: 41200
Age: 22
Game Shape: strong
Jump Shot: awful Jump Range: respectable
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: average
Driving: mediocre Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: atrocious Inside Def.: inept
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: strong Free Throw: mediocre

Which one is more suitable for a starting PG in your mind? I need your help. Many thanks in advance!

Last edited by Prof. Young at 6/18/2010 4:13:50 AM

I would also have gone with player#1 coz he has better skills.Moreover he score more points and will produce more assists thus helping in more turnovers and this will help ur team's regular performance.
Moreover game shape is a subject to change and u can also do that urself be giving ur team a training for game shape.



Ur welcome

I disagree that game shape is a total wast of precious training. If you are trying to win games, training GS is a great thing to train so that your players play at their best.

I believe one of the finalists of the B3 tournament in season 11 got there by training GS every week during the tourney. It all dpends on what you are trying to accomplish, I guess.

In the play-offs it's very common that the top leagues train Game Shape. It's an edge if you have all your best players with proficient game shape and the opponent's strong.

I'd go with the second..GS is a big factor in terms of performance.

Thank you all. I've decided to put player #1 as my starting PG.