BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > NT Season 12 Post-mortem

NT Season 12 Post-mortem

Set priority
Show messages by
From: wozzvt
This Post:
00
148382.1
Date: 6/28/2010 1:52:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
With Season 12 winding down and Season 13 getting set up, I wanted to take a couple minutes to look back on the past two seasons for the national team. We had our ups and downs, made huge strides forward in some areas, but ultimately fell just short of a trophy.

So, how'd we do?
Well, the route to World's wasn't exactly as planned. After cruising through much of qualifying, a surprising and difficult-to-explain loss to Colombia left us in 3rd in the group, and needing to go through the repechage to make World's. We drew two top-10 (or top-15) teams, in Nigeria and Portugal, but were able to hold them both off. The CT vs Portugal left us at a slight disadvantage entering World's (with slightly less than the 5 enthusiasm direct advancing teams got), but this ultimately didn't seem to make much of a difference.

In the opening round of World's, we drew a group that included host team China, and eventual champion Spain. We made the decision to TIE both of those games to build enthusiasm, and this seemed to pay off, as we won the rest of our matches and made it through the first round at 3-2. Unfortunately, as we knew, both China and Spain advanced, so we went through at 1-2. We were able to reasonably expect that it would take a 4-3 finish (or 3-4 with huge PD, which we were very unlikely to have) to make the semi's. So, the plan was to beat France at all costs, TIE Italy, and hope we had enough in the tank for Iran and Germany. Through the first 3 games, the plan worked, and we entered the final game in control of our own destiny. Unfortunately, the low enthusiasm finally caught up to us against a very good German squad, who beat us soundly, and left us out of the semi's based on point differential.

All in all, we were really gunning for 4th place at World's the whole way. With China hosting, and the strength of Spain and Italy, that was probably the best we could hope for. And we missed it by PD. In fact, our only season 12 losses were to the teams currently ranked #1, 2, 3 and 4 in the world, one of which had home court advantage. Although this is disappointing, I think we did a good job putting ourselves in position to have a shot right up until the last day.

What could have gone differently?
Looking back, there's two decisions that didn't work out as hoped, one I would change, and one I wouldn't. The first was way back in the first round of qualifying. We used a normal vs Uruguay, and lost. We normaled that because it would have essentially clinched a spot in the semi's. We thought it would be a safe win with the normal, but they found a weakness we had vs 3-2 (which was largely eliminated by Season 13, but I'll get to that), and beat us. Had we TIE'd, the extra enthusiasm probably would have been enough to beat Colombia and finish at 4-1, in a 3-way tie for 1st. Part of the rationale was that we thought we would likely lose the PD battle, but in retrospect, it was probably more important to build some more enthusiasm. Ultimately, I don't think this would have changed much--had we skipped the repechage, we would have had slightly more enthusiasm entering World's, but I don't think any of our 4 losses at World's would have turned out differently.

The second decision was using a CT vs France. We *needed* to win that game, but given the margin of victory, we may have underestimated our chances in a normal-normal. That would have left us in much better shape vs Germany. Although it's easy to say this was a mistake given the final outcome, I don't think I would have actually changed the decision to CT, since it was not a game we could have left up to chance. Put simply, if we lost that one, we were done.

From: wozzvt
This Post:
00
148382.2 in reply to 148382.1
Date: 6/28/2010 1:52:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
What's next?
The NT made some *huge* strides in the past few years, especially at the guard positions. We now have 3-4 guards (esp. Bronson, Madrid, Medrano) that I consider truly world class, and the comparison to the guys we ran out at the start of season 11 is striking. We had a clear weakness vs the 3-2 defense during qualifying that we largely overcame in Season 12. There was a huge turnover between Seasons 11 and 12, and we were able to get drastically better OD, more scoring everywhere, and a team that can pass as well as just about anyone in the world.

As huge an improvement we saw with our guards, our bigs didn't really progress much. Salary restrictions have really slowed the training of our top bigs, and limited the number of guys coming up to replace them. We've seen more guys in the Wyman mold that have interesting and useful secondaries, but are kind of stuck with about 4 guys with massive inside skills.

And, of course, we should all be pretty excited by what the U21 team did this season under Jelme's guidance. An undefeated run to the finals is incredible, and very promising. In fact, that U21 team has probably 4-5 guys with a legitimate chance to make a big impact on the NT sometime in the next few season, which is a pretty staggering number for a single class.

From: Rambo

This Post:
00
148382.3 in reply to 148382.2
Date: 6/28/2010 2:09:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
One of the things I continue to enjoy is seeing the players progress throughout the season. Edju always did a great job of updating the roster and Coco did a good job of updating who popped that week. With such a strong U21 class graduating it will be particularly interesting to keep a log or training camp (as was suggested by Jelme maybe?) of the players who are on the cusp and what our flexibility is. There will always be the gap that players will have to overcome between the U21 and the NT but being able to track and grow interest in these players will be huge.

Another possibility is trying to set up a comp system between our players and the other NT players who's skills we know. For instance, how does Madrid stack up against other SGs, etc. etc. Right now we have them all listed in sequential order in the forum based on when they were discovered but I don't know if you track them any other way.