BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > 3 changes I'd love to see

3 changes I'd love to see

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
152135.2 in reply to 152135.1
Date: 7/19/2010 6:18:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
The only one I have problems with is nr2.
BB's already introduced an option to switch your player defencive assignements, to help with training out of position, choosing winning over training (and vice versa) still needs to remain a tactic. You really can't have both. Your suggestion would make training really easy (making a versatile player) with no extra cost. You need to know when you can get away playing you C as PG and when you can't. With options to train everything at every position, will make training forgettable, no need to think in order to get near perfect results.

From: Shoei
This Post:
00
152135.4 in reply to 152135.3
Date: 7/20/2010 11:57:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
can you add the chance that the coach be kicked off or send off the court for excessive arguing or a technical for the staff when calls arent going there way?

also include the probabilty that once a coach is send off . . . . the team plays better or berserk mode :D

This Post:
00
152135.5 in reply to 152135.1
Date: 7/28/2010 3:34:00 AM
Aussie Pride
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
543543
I think your first suggestion is great. Mixing up the conferences would make things a lot less predictable. I know in the Australian top division one conference has been stronger then the other for quite a while.

This Post:
00
152135.6 in reply to 152135.5
Date: 7/28/2010 4:22:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I think your first suggestion is great. Mixing up the conferences would make things a lot less predictable. I know in the Australian top division one conference has been stronger then the other for quite a while.


in the german one, one league check yesterday, that since season 5 team the right division has three demoted teams ;)

This Post:
00
152135.7 in reply to 152135.6
Date: 7/28/2010 6:39:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
5. Anyone else feel that 42 days of not logging in is an incredibly long time to go bot? A full month (30 days) is more than enough time. I actually prefer like, 20 days of not logging in.


Disagree. I go overseas every year for a month at Christmas. While it is fine if you are visiting Europe or the US, when you are doing the Everest base camp trek or floating down the Amazon River there is little chance of coming across an Internet Cafe so that little extra time is a wonderful thing.

This Post:
00
152135.8 in reply to 152135.1
Date: 7/28/2010 7:05:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
1. Leagues need more parity. There are many leagues out there where one side of the conference is incredibly stacked, and the other side is significantly weaker; and it stays that way for many seasons. All teams need to be shuffled at the end of every season to have more parity. Besides the top leagues, the bottom leagues suffer as well, aspecially when theres 3-4 bot teams consistently on one side of the conference while the other side always has 8 active managers fighting for their lives to stay there. Shuffle up the conferences at the end of the season dudes. Give the leagues more parity.

Overall I don't like this suggestion as I prefer the rivalries that take time to develop over more equal conferences. And I pretty much know how the current system can turn out having played several seasons in the overall stronger and much more competitive conference of my country's top league. (The Great 8 teams are free to disagree.)

However, especially in top leagues (div I and in some cases lower), the league can get unbalanced over time and something should perhaps be done about that to keep the competition more interesting without hampering too much with the rivalries. How about switching of only a single pair of teams every season? Like the number 5 teams? The 5th spot is nowadays typically the one to avoid in many leagues. Obviously switching of conferences could make that spot even more hated or slightly more rewarding, depending on which conference you currently reside in.

Last edited by GM-WallyOop at 7/28/2010 7:08:00 AM

This Post:
00
152135.9 in reply to 152135.8
Date: 7/28/2010 7:31:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
How about switching of only a single pair of teams every season? Like the number 5 teams? The 5th spot is nowadays typically the one to avoid in many leagues. Obviously switching of conferences could make that spot even more hated or slightly more rewarding, depending on which conference you currently reside in.


Love the idea! 5th place is a place in the middle which is good, and would finally give some meaning to the dullness of coming 5th.

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
152135.10 in reply to 152135.8
Date: 7/28/2010 2:17:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I agree, this is a great idea. I'm gonna 5ball you for that! :P

This Post:
00
152135.11 in reply to 152135.10
Date: 7/28/2010 5:56:58 PM
ChemCats Chemnitz
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Even 7th place should change the conference when he/she was strong enough to beat other conference's 6th. ;-)

This would trade strength because one of the promoted teams would come to the stronger conference that slowly would adjust the level (less pressure on the former better conference ...).