BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Things to do better

Things to do better

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
88
165259.1
Date: 11/30/2010 3:59:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Things to do better

1.The games should be able to be watch by flash programation.
2.Be abel to see the money progress of each player. The pay in each season.
3.Should be a MVP in the All-Star, and the team should get money for it.
4.Each season must have a portait of the player with must scores, assistence's, etc.. ( the best of each one )
5.Should be a votation of the best player of the month. ( must be the machine who choose )
6.Give a money reward por things like: ''Winer of the ''triples'' show ( 3 points score ), most score player on the league, mvp of all-star, mvp playoff... )
7.In the private leagues, should pay to play them, and the first and second winners get the money reward.
8.Could do 2 kinds of training.


Vote me please!

Together we will obtain changes

This Post:
11
165259.2 in reply to 165259.1
Date: 11/30/2010 4:09:52 PM
JMDCeltics
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
32603260
Vote me please!


Here you are, +1.

Nice suggestions.

This Post:
22
165259.3 in reply to 165259.1
Date: 11/30/2010 4:24:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
798798
7.In the private leagues, should pay to play them, and the first and second winners get the money reward.


It's not a correct option to change because supporters would be with advantage. It wouldn't be correct for non-supporters players.

You have to remember that supporters like you and me are paying to obtain more game options not to have a money advantage ;)


Posiblemente la mejor fede de BB (/community/fedoverview.aspx?fedid=11271)
This Post:
00
165259.4 in reply to 165259.3
Date: 11/30/2010 4:58:21 PM
Shohoku CB
III.12
Overall Posts Rated:
10401040
7.In the private leagues, should pay to play them, and the first and second winners get the money reward.


It's not a correct option to change because supporters would be with advantage. It wouldn't be correct for non-supporters players.

You have to remember that supporters like you and me are paying to obtain more game options not to have a money advantage ;)


+1 Arni

This Post:
00
165259.5 in reply to 165259.1
Date: 11/30/2010 5:20:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
It's not a correct option to change because supporters would be with advantage. It wouldn't be correct for non-supporters players.

I understand what you say but that perhaps is the problem. The current system of supporters and non-supporters can not establish these changes, which would help to improve the method of play for all users.

I think that BB should consider how best to implement.

Alan. Here is my vote! 1+

This Post:
00
165259.6 in reply to 165259.1
Date: 11/30/2010 5:24:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Should be a MVP in the All-Star, and the team should get money for it.

Give a money reward por things like: ''Winer of the ''triples'' show ( 3 points score ), most score player on the league, mvp of all-star, mvp playoff... )


When these games are played in arcade mode and with no proper selection process (i.e the all star voting seems more random than ensuring the best player makes the team), you can not give financial rewards to teams. It is justly unfair for teams that don't have players on the all star team for no fault of their own than for a crappy all star voting process.

This Post:
00
165259.7 in reply to 165259.6
Date: 12/1/2010 5:31:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
210210
You can also catch and make your contribution a player on your team by position.

And in your list of voting to choose a position player for each of the co-conference (of which they have submitted).

Whoever takes the most votes by position goes to allstar.

This Post:
00
165259.8 in reply to 165259.7
Date: 12/5/2010 10:06:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
I understand what are u trying to say about the private leagues, but could be posible to find a way for both players to be ok, the sponsors and the not sponsors, but, because the sponsor pay, it should be a little advantage for them.

About the votations, i think that it's quite correct and just process votation for the best player, and yes, i think that having a good player, dosn't matter a all-star, winner of concurse of ''triples'' ( 3 points score ) or the most score player of the league, must win a money reward or level up, because the reality, when u win a reward, u start to trust more on yourself and play better.

good luck to everyone ^^

This Post:
00
165259.9 in reply to 165259.8
Date: 12/7/2010 7:32:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
534534
I think you supporters don´t realice the advantage that playing in a private league is. I don´t use to play with my best team in league because i have to train and to take care about minutes played and game shape. To test your best team once a week is a realy good advantage, cause it lets you go to play off knowing wich players work better toguether and with wich tactic they play better. I am tired of people asking for more things for supporters and not taking advantages of what they have. The rest of proposals are ok... well, I don´t think two simultaneos trainings are a good idea either.

This Post:
00
165259.10 in reply to 165259.9
Date: 12/8/2010 3:11:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Private leagues can be an added convenience and can make things easier, but they do not provide an in-game advantage. So they are no different than any other Supporter feature.

This Post:
00
165259.11 in reply to 165259.10
Date: 12/8/2010 4:16:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
534534
I agree, they don´t provide an
in-game advantage
but playing in your private league makes testing your PO team much more easy. I don´t think it is unfair, paying must have some advantage and improving your "game experience" it is a sutil advantage that can be very helpfull. I wast critizising th people that continiusly ask for mor options for supporters and don´t realice they have a very usefull diference with the non-supporters, the private league.