BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 3-2 Vs 1-3-1

3-2 Vs 1-3-1

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
16539.1
Date: 2/19/2008 5:21:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
It's a Q about defensive strategy. Which is better against a team that has best ratings at Outside Scoring and Inside Scoring, and poor ratings at the other positions: 3-2 or 1-3-1.

Q2: What does Offensive Flow stands for? How important is Offesinve flow? How do U opose strong defensive flow?

Last edited by Onisifor at 2/19/2008 5:23:56 AM

This Post:
00
16539.2 in reply to 16539.1
Date: 2/19/2008 5:25:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
178178
If he is good outside then you should play 3-2...

If he is REALLY GOOD outside then 1-3-1 is better solution...

"Da ste vi bolji narod i ja bi` bio bolji vladar!" - Knjaz Milos
This Post:
00
16539.3 in reply to 16539.1
Date: 2/19/2008 5:29:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
against an team with good outside AND Inside scoring, i would prefer a "man to man" defence but maybe a 2-3 or 3-2 makes sense if your Forward can't defend inside or outside. Maybe yu play an full court press too.

If your opponents play with an outside Focus and had some layers who could rebound well, i would play 3-2 if he got trouble with rebounding you could risk your ability to grab rebounds at the defend end for a pretty strong outside defence.

Offenflow is important for getting good oppurtunities to score, a team with bad offense score would take more difficult shots.

This Post:
00
16539.4 in reply to 16539.3
Date: 2/19/2008 11:42:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
....Offenflow is important for getting good oppurtunities to score, a team with bad offense score would take more difficult shots.


Does it mean that offensive flow is determened primarily by the overal passing skill of the team roster?

This Post:
00
16539.5 in reply to 16539.4
Date: 2/19/2008 11:49:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
especially passing from the PG and a it less important from the SG and SF the influence from the big men is not so high.

But i think the handling and driving have also an influence on this, but i can't say it exactly maybe someone with more knowledge could say you more.

This Post:
00
16539.6 in reply to 16539.5
Date: 2/20/2008 3:22:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
About 50% pg 30% sg 20% SF.

This Post:
00
16539.7 in reply to 16539.6
Date: 3/1/2008 1:39:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
when a team plays 1-3-1 does that mean the PF's contribution is also added to the Perimeter defense rating?

has anyone examples of the difference in rebounding when they have played 3v2 vs when they played 1-3-1?

any links to games where 1-3-1 has been used would be great...

This Post:
00
16539.8 in reply to 16539.7
Date: 3/1/2008 1:46:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
if the 1-3-1 is anything like in real life then the PF positions himself at the free throw line with the point guard in front of him. i don't think that counts as perimeter defense but it is definitely further out than he would normally play.

This Post:
00
16539.9 in reply to 16539.8
Date: 3/1/2008 1:53:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
sorry excuse my ignorance... i am toying whether to play this later or not... advantages are higher perimeter defence... downside is RB loss.... is the gain and loss equally balanced in your opinion or would i be sacrificing more ID/RB for the sake of just a little extra OD

This Post:
00
16539.10 in reply to 16539.9
Date: 3/1/2008 2:04:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
you would be sacrificing more ID/RB as 4 of your players will be closer to the perimeter.

This Post:
00
16539.11 in reply to 16539.10
Date: 3/1/2008 2:25:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
so to play 1-3-1 effectively you need to have a big mismatch in skills from both teams... 1 team must be totally guard dominant with no inside threat to worry about...the other team i suppose must have enought ID/RB to take care of whatever is necessary inside the paint then can gang up to try and reduce the point tally of the opps guards...

cheers