BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Over 33 Tournament

Over 33 Tournament

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
165432.1
Date: 12/3/2010 11:50:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
293293
(165332.11)

Figured I'd throw this in here.

This Post:
00
165432.3 in reply to 165432.2
Date: 12/7/2010 2:56:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
293293
I just thought it was funny... I'm not the one who suggested it.

This Post:
00
165432.4 in reply to 165432.2
Date: 12/7/2010 10:03:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
I'm sorry mate, maybe this is funny but unnecessary..

I'm sure we can find a lot of unnecessary, yet widely used additions that have been made since BB started.

To the OP, would the O-33 NT rosters be limited to retired players, like I'm guessing is the case in real life?

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
This Post:
11
165432.5 in reply to 165432.4
Date: 12/9/2010 2:21:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
I'm all in. I think it could be great fun addition and as a side product it could motivate managers to train their NT players even beyond 23-26 years (the reasonable way). And they could get some slight merchandise as a revenue when those would be finally pushed out from "A" NT senior teams.

If there would be some sort of regime as for NT/u21. I am for pairing it up with u21 cycle.

Surely not retired players, they don't even getting older many times do the wouldn't have the age if sacked at younger age.