BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Question about GS

Question about GS

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
166083.1
Date: 12/12/2010 11:36:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
From what I know GS the following week reflects GS from the previous week, meaning you much more likely to reach proficient GS next week if your current GS is strong as opposed to atrocious. With this being said, if I train for 2 weeks straight, I will have better game shape 2 weeks from now as opposed to just training the prior week. Logically the answer is obvious but you never know with the way things work so I just want to confirm this

This Post:
00
166083.2 in reply to 166083.1
Date: 12/13/2010 12:56:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
A rise in GS is closely aligned with the amount of minutes played. Generally speaking, a player with 48-70 minutes will result in a likely rise in GS.

Training GS is generally not recommended as GS can rise from good minute management. You are better off training your players primary skills and save GS training for 2 game weeks

This Post:
00
166083.3 in reply to 166083.2
Date: 12/13/2010 1:14:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
Yeah I understand how 48-72 minutes is optimal for GS. What I'm really looking to do thou is make sure that heading to playoffs I will have all my players at proficient shape. I do aim to manage the minutes well so my game shape will rise the following 2 weeks but I rather be secure about it than gamble without training GS.

Also, I know DMI for strong GS is about 45-50% of proficient GS and respectable GS is like 25-35% of proficient GS. Does that mean that it is significantly better to have proficient GS relative to Strong GS as opposed to Strong GS relative to Respectable GS

This Post:
00
166083.4 in reply to 166083.3
Date: 12/13/2010 2:53:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Personally, I wouldn't look too much into DMI. Its called the deliberately meaningless index for a reason.

I think 2 weeks of training GS is a waste as you can achieve the same results through good minute management but that is up to you. That extra pop or 2 can result in trainees being worth more than what u get in a bump in GS. It can still be random and I have never done GS training myself but good luck with that.

This Post:
00
166083.5 in reply to 166083.3
Date: 12/13/2010 4:01:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
194194
I think it would be really really hard and takes a lot of effort to have all your players' GS at proficient, even if you train GS at the same time. However, it could be very "cool" to have all of your players on proficient GS. Your opponents might as well just run away from looking at your players' GS :D

This Post:
00
166083.7 in reply to 166083.6
Date: 12/13/2010 5:58:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
Also, I know DMI for strong GS is about 45-50% of proficient GS and respectable GS is like 25-35% of proficient GS. Does that mean that it is significantly better to have proficient GS relative to Strong GS as opposed to Strong GS relative to Respectable GS

A thing to keep in mind: proficient game shape is a point (9.0). All other game shapes are intervals, e.g. strong can be anything between 8.0 and 8.9.

I figured that was the case, so in response to what I was asking to be more specific. Would a GS of 9.0 relative to GS of 8.0 be significantly better than GS of 8.0 relative to GS of 7.0

This Post:
00
166083.9 in reply to 166083.8
Date: 12/17/2010 8:35:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
Ok thanks that's very helpful. I guess from my understanding of what you said, practically there isn't significant difference in performance from strong to proficient GS as opposed to respectable to strong GS.

This Post:
00
166083.10 in reply to 166083.8
Date: 12/17/2010 9:36:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
I think it Caps at Prominent, then the Next week it goes down to Proficient No matter what

This Post:
00
166083.11 in reply to 166083.10
Date: 12/17/2010 11:00:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Maximum GS is Proficient. It can never get up to Prominent