BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Question about training

Question about training

Set priority
Show messages by
From: -CS
This Post:
00
16628.1
Date: 2/19/2008 7:10:36 PM
GinaKia
MBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I am training PG, one of my player playing PG for 2 match and another match he play as center, in this situation, he will miss training for PG position?

hope someone can help me

From: KingCharles

To: -CS
This Post:
00
16628.2 in reply to 16628.1
Date: 2/19/2008 7:19:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
if you set the training for PG only then yes he will only receive training for the time spent in that position. therefore he won't benefit from playing center...though i don't know why you would play a PG at center.

From: ACCA13

To: -CS
This Post:
00
16628.3 in reply to 16628.1
Date: 2/19/2008 7:20:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
nope if he plays as PG 48 min

This Post:
00
16628.4 in reply to 16628.3
Date: 2/19/2008 7:55:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
if that player reach the 48 minutes and if really in good shape, why don´t you train another player? if is a good shape and a respectable or strong in stamina he can play the entire match, so you can train three guys in a week. Just my thoughts

From: -CS

This Post:
00
16628.5 in reply to 16628.4
Date: 2/20/2008 12:58:19 AM
GinaKia
MBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I play him in PG because i wanna train his passing, he is multiskill player and i want to train 3 player in a position if possible.

1 more question, if in the PG position, I have no set up for back up player, mean the current player MUST play 48min? i know he need a good stamina skill.

From: Krakonico

To: -CS
This Post:
00
16628.6 in reply to 16628.5
Date: 2/20/2008 6:25:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Ok...

but keep in mind this:

1) you are training Passing, and only PG... right

2) Any player who are playing as PG in the whole week get the trainign "minute regime" for that week.

3) the maximun minute is 48 for training, more minute doesn't affet training regime.

4) that what i said to you, you can train more people if he get the 48, you can train more people as PG, but you have to keep and eye for that player don't get more than 96 minutes in a week.

For your question, maybe yes, maybe no... remember that if he push a foul the coach would sit him for some minutes, if he get 3 or 4 of them.. and the stamina level to play all the 48 minutes is from excelent, i don't know if regular level can play all the match...

From: -CS

This Post:
00
16628.7 in reply to 16628.6
Date: 2/20/2008 9:11:34 PM
GinaKia
MBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Thanks for your answer.

From: Red Rain

To: -CS
This Post:
00
16628.8 in reply to 16628.7
Date: 2/21/2008 1:04:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Hm I guess my question might fit in this thread:
We are all talking about a trainee to receive 100% training for playing 48 minutes, but is there anything special about that barrier or would a trainee receive exactly 50% of training for playing 24 minutes.

Thank you for your time!

From: -CS

This Post:
00
16628.9 in reply to 16628.8
Date: 2/21/2008 1:51:31 AM
GinaKia
MBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
48minutes for full 100% training only..
24minutes can not get 50%

From: Red Rain

To: -CS
This Post:
00
16628.10 in reply to 16628.9
Date: 2/21/2008 2:14:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Sorry if my last message was unclear.

I know that players receive trainingseffect for playing less than 48 minutes.

If a player doesn't receive 47/48 of the trainingseffect for playing 47/48 minutes I would be very glad to see some kind of table or distribution curve.

Excuse my bad English and thank you for answers.

This Post:
00
16628.11 in reply to 16628.8
Date: 2/21/2008 2:25:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
It is not known. The rules state:

"If players play under 48 minutes, they will still improve, but less quickly than they would if they got more playing time."

Let's say that you are training two positions, say PG/SG. You have 288 minutes at the two positions, so theoretically you can train 6 players with 48 minutes each. But you most likely will have some players go over 48 minutes, which are wasted minutes af far as training.

But if training were proportional in the manner you suggest, you might be able to have 8 players play an average of 36 minutes. With no wasted training, training 9 players at 75% is equivalent to 6 players at 100%.

So there might be checks to keep teams from gaming the training system. On the other hand, if you are training 9 players, you may be having trouble keeping the players in game shape, and may also be losing games because you are trying to get extra minutes in. For example if you used a different starter in each of the 3 games who played 36 minutes, and the same backup who managed 36 minutes from the 3 games, then you could be using your #1 PG in one league game, your #2 in the 2nd league game, your #3 in the scrimmage, and the #4 as a backup. You may have to be paying more in salaries to get a #2 PG who can start have your league games, and a #4 who isn't totally useless as a sub.

It doesn't make sense that 47 minutes would be drastically less than 100%, so I've assumed that the training efficiiency function is continuous. But that could be satisified with something like: (PT/48) squared. 47 minutes would be 98% efficient, but 24 minutes would only be 25%.