BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > GS and DMI experiment

GS and DMI experiment

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
188014.1
Date: 6/23/2011 9:35:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
Hey guys,

Just bought a guy that had 123 minutes played, and played him for 171 total in the week. What should I expect(more like a guessing game for anyone out there.)

Proficient GS now with a 403K DMI.

My random guess is tomorrow he will have respectable GS and 213 DMI.

I haven't really kept track of DMI before but it seems to help tell performance-wise what to expect.

This Post:
00
188014.2 in reply to 188014.1
Date: 6/23/2011 9:47:10 PM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
544544
Why would u play a guy that already had 123 minutes for the week?

This Post:
00
188014.3 in reply to 188014.1
Date: 6/23/2011 9:50:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
I'm guessing his game shape will be Awful/Inept. That's about 4x the amount for proficient gameshape.

This Post:
00
188014.4 in reply to 188014.2
Date: 6/23/2011 10:30:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
Haha, training of course. might as well. My league is set as it is. not too big a deal if i have to build it up.

This Post:
00
188014.5 in reply to 188014.4
Date: 6/23/2011 10:46:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
With that many minutes played are you sure he didnt' already have enough training minutes at the position you wanted?

This Post:
00
188014.6 in reply to 188014.5
Date: 6/23/2011 11:01:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
Yes. He played SG for all those minutes. I was training SF and PF. None of my trainees had close to enough SG minutes

This Post:
00
188014.7 in reply to 188014.5
Date: 6/23/2011 11:40:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
123 vs. 171 really doesn't matter. At that point I think it's funny that he played him that much even if he already had training minutes for the week. I doubt that it goes below respectable as well...it could go to average i guess but not below that. 171 isn't even 3 times the minutes for proficient game shape though....so whoever said 4 times is a bit off on their math. ;)

This Post:
00
188014.9 in reply to 188014.8
Date: 6/24/2011 12:02:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
I know that he had not. That was the purpose of the statement....saying that even if he had I still like it!

This Post:
00
188014.10 in reply to 188014.7
Date: 6/24/2011 2:23:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
I did say "about 4 times". This is going off my own experience. I don't know what the exact numbers are.

Last edited by WFUnDina at 6/24/2011 2:24:32 AM

This Post:
00
188014.11 in reply to 188014.10
Date: 6/24/2011 7:25:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
he dropped to 7 funny test :)