BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Need some help

Need some help

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Debaser
This Post:
00
19011.1
Date: 3/11/2008 3:52:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
(2858391)

I would really appreciate if someone cared to elaborate on the reasons I lost that match. I can't find that big difference that the score reflects on the team ratings, and I guess I must be doing something wrong.

Should I have played a "faster" tactic on the offense?

Thanks for helping out.

This Post:
00
19011.2 in reply to 19011.1
Date: 3/11/2008 5:04:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
You should post in here (14900.1)

Anyway... personal opinion: I hate low post! In particular with a low offensive flow. You end up with lots of turnovers and with the ball still in your hands at the end of the 24 sec... taking 'desperation' shots.
So yes, if I were you I would give a try to look inside.

But you should try to improve your team a bit... offensive flow and rebounding in particular are quite low

Last edited by Newton07 at 3/11/2008 5:05:16 PM

This Post:
00
19011.3 in reply to 19011.2
Date: 3/11/2008 5:37:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Hey, thanks for the input.

Yeh, I know my team still has a lot to improve, but I was thinking the opposition team really wasn't much better, so I guessed there was something wrong with the tactics. It was my first time using low post, so I think I'll heed your advice and stay away from it for a while! :)

This Post:
00
19011.4 in reply to 19011.3
Date: 3/13/2008 12:39:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Hello,

I readed on the rules following notice:

For the other training types, players will improve more quickly not only with additional playing time, but also a more skilled player will improve more quickly.

Does it counts also Stamina/Free Throws? While i have it better, will be also the training of the other skills (little bit) faster?

Last edited by Iordanou at 3/13/2008 12:43:59 PM

This Post:
00
19011.5 in reply to 19011.4
Date: 3/13/2008 1:30:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
I'm not sure but I don't think so.

it is ment for 'helpfull' skills.
e.g. if you train someone with average inside defense in blocking, he will train faster than a player with awfull inside defense. But I doubt that a player with awfull jumprange will train slower than one with average jumprange if you train blocking....

I also believe this diffrence to be minor. Say if you train the one guy for a period of 5 pops, the other might only have 4 pops. I don't think one will pop twice while the other won't... age will be more important here, and height also has some influence.
At this stage we know to little to make clear and certain statements, it's still a bit guessing.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
19011.6 in reply to 19011.1
Date: 3/13/2008 5:23:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
there are a couple of reasons you lost the game.
turnovers 9 more than steals
rebounds 9 less than other team.

And outside defends, they scored 10 3 pointers.

So balance your team it looks nice to have a mediocre, but if the rest is awful you will lose the match.

This Post:
00
19011.7 in reply to 19011.5
Date: 3/14/2008 4:12:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I thought that this is still unknown issue, thank you anyway!

S/FT aren't like usuall skills, but should to make training faster - you know more energy and focus to buzzer during the training:)

From: Emilio

This Post:
00
19011.8 in reply to 19011.2
Date: 3/14/2008 1:40:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
I like very much your explanation!
Particularly, the relationship between a low offensive flow and turnovers in this kind of slow tactic (LP) is really interesting and also very close to the puzzling statements of the rules.
What do you think is determining the offensive flow? Handling is clear, passing is not so clear to me, but I guess there should be something else... any idea?

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
This Post:
00
19011.9 in reply to 19011.6
Date: 3/16/2008 12:43:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I don't quite agree with some points of your analysis.

Though it is obviously true that my team still needs some balance (I have only played 7 league games yet, so I'm really starting and working on it), it also is undeniable that my team seems overally better than that game's opposition. Their strongest asset was the outside shooting, but my outside defense wasn't much worse. On the other hand, my inside shooting was WAY superior to their inside defense. Both teams had the same ratings on rebounding and ball movement.

So, first of all, I find no real explanation to the lack of success of my frontcourt (Mailänder went 6/20, Safón 1/5 on FGM-A) and also find it hard to accept that we had 9 less rebounds than our rivals.