Some opinions needed please..........
I've got a level 4 trainer and am focusing on one-position training of PG's. I have 3 that I am training, and I give each of them a start and let them play a full 48 minute game each by putting them in at PG and backup and reserve. In short, they all play one game and get 48 minutes per week at PG. The rest of the week, whoever is not playing PG will play backup SG and backup SF to get their minutes to about 70.
But some skills you can only train for guards, meaning both PG and SG., When this happens, would it be wise to train my 20-year old stud center at SG to raise his outside skills? My 20 year old center is the best player on the team, with Per. All Star potential. But I've not been training him because I have 3 PGs, two 18 y/o and one 19 y/o who are all Per. All Star potential and have already had some nice pops. I only have the one inside player to train, or I may have trained them instead of PGs.
Anyway, should I train my C at a G position? Or would it be unnecessary skill increases that would just raise his salary for skills he won't use that much? I do understand that to do this, I would not be able to play him both games per week and then the scrimmage at G for training purposes because the high minutes would put him at risk of injury as well as bad game shape.
Any opinions or information on this is appreciated.