BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Allowing different deffence strategy for the starters

Allowing different deffence strategy for the starters

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
207535.1
Date: 1/28/2012 10:52:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
This suggestion can be defined to be more whole but it will cost in complexity.

Hence, I suggest this one which is simpler, but add enough for the common cases.

The suggestion is to allowing a different deffence strategy for the starters and the rest of the players.
This will allow users to use a different deffence combination. One that is suiting the starters and one for the startups.

There are games where you can supprise your opponent with a C that will play as a SF and create an advantage but will defend the C, but his backup can only play the C or the SF good enough (for example).

When one of those players that is "cross" deffending is sent to the bench, the deffensive strategy for him and the other player will be upon the backups.

An example:
Starters (Main) deffence strategy: PG Defending SG, SG => PG, SF => PF, PF => C, C => SF.
Backup deffence strategy: Regular (PG=>PG, SG=>SG, SF=>SF, PF=>PF, C=>C).
When one of the cross defending players (C, PF or SF) is replaced, the backup strategy will take place for that group.
In other words, the deffence strategy will be changed into: PG Defending SG, SG => PG, SF => SF, PF => PF, C => C.

This Post:
00
207535.3 in reply to 207535.2
Date: 1/28/2012 12:46:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
It had been explained and exampled...

When one of the starters is subbed, and his backup had been defined differently than he has, than all relevant players will play upon the backup definitions.

This does NOT mean that all the players will play deffence upon the backup ones, but just the ones relevant to that sub.

[See example. If not clear, bring your own example]

This Post:
00
207535.6 in reply to 207535.5
Date: 1/29/2012 4:19:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
This is a good suggestion that I've already saw.
But it is not relevant to this discussion.
Moreover - you are suggesting adding a new deffence strategy, this suggestion is about allowing to define a different strategy for the Starters and their Backups.

This Post:
00
207535.8 in reply to 207535.7
Date: 1/29/2012 8:51:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
ok ok its your suggest :(:(:(:(:(
i'll go like a little puppy to my own hole!!
The point is that no good will come from having a completely different suggestion at the same thread.

Last edited by Pini פיני at 1/29/2012 8:52:25 AM

This Post:
00
207535.10 in reply to 207535.9
Date: 1/29/2012 9:56:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
ok ok its your suggest :(:(:(:(:(
i'll go like a little puppy to my own hole!!
The point is that no good will come from having a completely different suggestion at the same thread.

you are a dreamer!!!
no good will come from any thread these days xddddddddddddd
I hope and believe that something will.
The question is why you are using those thread if you don't believe they have any essence?...