BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Arena income for technical loss

Arena income for technical loss

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
99
211163.1
Date: 2/21/2012 5:50:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
157157
Okey, technical loss (25-0) means there was no game.
If there was no game, so there should not be any spectators as well.
Even if I (as spectator) bought a ticket, it must be refunded in real life.

So there is absolutely no logical answer how is it possible to get any arena income from the game which did not happen.

Okey, lets leave it as a compensation for home teams, which register their players and are not guilty for away team, which does not come. Though even this does not make sence, but okey, its a game, still, not a real life.

But home team, which does not register its players must have arena income equal to zero. And please throw a rock to me if you could argue with this.

From: GM-hrudey

This Post:
22
211163.3 in reply to 211163.2
Date: 2/21/2012 7:49:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I think your completely right. I belive that a system where if a team forfeits he should have to pay the attendance as a fine for not being able to field a team. The away team pays the home team and the home team pays his fans.
Think this would drastically decrease the number of wo's in the game.


I concur. Or even taking something from the Hattrick model, losing a percentage of season ticket holders and training for the week whenever you field a walkover. It needs to be the case that a forfeit loss is clearly and undeniably worse than even the worst blowout loss.

This Post:
00
211163.4 in reply to 211163.1
Date: 2/23/2012 8:53:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55315531
Thanks for this post. I totally agree with you!

From: Rana

This Post:
00
211163.5 in reply to 211163.1
Date: 2/23/2012 10:17:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
232232
Me too. Good idea.

And to continue with your idea: if the Home team can't play, because a away team does not come, the away team have to pay the tickets. It is the penalty for the not comming team. So such teams have a disprofit in every case.

Sorry for my bad English, I hope you understand what I mean.

This Post:
00
211163.6 in reply to 211163.1
Date: 2/23/2012 10:38:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14871487
Agree, very good idea!

From: Duck

This Post:
00
211163.7 in reply to 211163.2
Date: 2/23/2012 11:01:53 AM
Dirty Ducks
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
1072610726
I belive that a system where if a team forfeits he should have to pay the attendance as a fine for not being able to field a team. The away team pays the home team and the home team pays his fans.
Think this would drastically decrease the number of wo's in the game.


Excellent idea, and should be easy to make for the BBs.

@Internal: Thx mate

This Post:
00
211163.8 in reply to 211163.1
Date: 2/23/2012 12:35:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I don't like tit, an additional or different punishment then the tiebreaker in the standing(which some teams also find desireable) would be nice, but one complete loss of income is a very hard punishment and i believe most WO comes from team who already decided to quit and are on the way to a bot who wouldn't care(or maybe even bancrott on purpose) or by accident(who didn't planned it before).

Another scenario of WO is from teams who are in debt, there all your player get listed and when you don't make it in time or even on a positive bilance you get punished with up to 630k again for not fielding a team.

This Post:
00
211163.10 in reply to 211163.9
Date: 2/23/2012 12:49:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959

If you are in debt, your players will still be there on Tuesday and you'll have money to bought players before saturday, even shitty ones.


i know team who was still in debt, and had to tank 1-2 weeks before they could buy shitty players. Also thursday would be cup, ok there is no visitor income but wo should be bad there, too?



About forgetting one time, okay, we can give one free pass, then after never ever you'll be allowed to forget it or cheat the system.


forgetting one time, is mostly the intentionel one. So you would just get the dudes, who wants to bancrupt there team, so that it get deleted faster(which means actually more forfeits).