BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > ST vs GS

ST vs GS

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
217761.2 in reply to 217761.1
Date: 5/17/2012 12:09:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
GS > ST

This Post:
00
217761.4 in reply to 217761.3
Date: 5/17/2012 5:11:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
Both can go hand in hand, but GS is better IMO. And I think Loid tried to do the same thing, but know he is in a D.III league.

This Post:
00
217761.5 in reply to 217761.3
Date: 5/17/2012 11:57:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I had a guy with great stamina and he constantly overperformed. But he always had good GS and nice experience, so I wouldn't know what factor took the bigger part in it.

I'd also go with GS though. It depends on quality of your subs. I had a SF with ST=2 and he played very good...for 24 minutes/game. But I had a good sub, so it worked out. If I hadn't, I couldn't afford a player with ST=2.

This Post:
00
217761.8 in reply to 217761.7
Date: 5/23/2012 7:50:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
Or in Andre Miller's case, play with injuries.

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
217761.9 in reply to 217761.6
Date: 5/24/2012 3:10:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I think GS works somewhat like a multiplier and stamina works relative to minutes across the stretch of the game....


From my experience and experience of others on forums I think the same. I remember Venomous Scorpions had good stamina on players and would always come back from deficit in 4th quarter. Thrylos played against him few seasons ago in semfinals I think and although Thrylos' team was better built for tactics he played, VS's players had more rough power and better stamina. Something like this year's Indiana against Miami Heat. Pacers have depth, but Miami has rough superstar power.