BuzzerBeater Forums

yes or no. give a reason why.?

my opinion is it hurts the game, it also imbalances the game. A lot are talking about fairness and this fall into their argument of that.? IMo

Your thought please should LI be removed for the sake of this fairness argument a lot like to make.. My opinion basketball is meant to be fair. At same time this tactic imbalance the game and is killing BB the market. Something has to give in that aspect.

I agree 100%. the GDP is a huge help to help balance things out and I personally see no need to delete LI from the game.

NO.

The only thing wrong with LI in the game is all the whining in the forums. They don't need to eliminate LI, they need to find a way to figuratively stuff a sock in all the whining.

When was it ever an improvement to remove something that works well? What you're left with is a lesser game, not a better one.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 11/30/2014 10:58:10 PM

I don't think it stupid thing to do .Think about it.


A lot know what your say is true, . LI is easy a fix if they do this or that .. But the reality is none of what they have done today is working. I don't see them making the said fixes.Managers are using these new prevents to increase dominance of LI in their own team at a cheaper cost rate.

Look at the market almost 75-80% of the players are LI players. Im just guessing with that. I would say its greater than my guess. Removing LI would make managers create other players for the market. We would see more Princeton players.. motion players. paitent players, push the ball etc etc.

Low post would be what they could play, At the same time low post can be beaten much more easy than LI? They would have to go another route.

Im just saying, don't you think it hurts the games with a majority of the market player being Li tactical players.? if the fixes where so easy and said sure. then why aren't any of them working??

Please leave me a 2nd reply.

Yes I know the facts but the bid difference is Lp can be beaten much easier than LI.

I dont think it whining its real BB concern in my book.. because motion is not as powerful as it use to be as matter of fact neither is run &gun.

They took measure to reduce those , they work. Li on the other hand the measures they have taken do not really work, gdp be damned. I don't assume a lot of shot block is going to work , you'll get getting alive by rebounds and second chance point from LI. Reb in guards is crazy expensive also with sb even more. Some may say the reduction helped but for who really know the pops are not as fact as some make them sound.

I think Sb increases fouls. Li increase fouls from my seeing . Li is a advanced tactic, there for like you said and I have said you need advanced players with good exp. This comes at huge cost also time.

BB know this, but why haven't they done it. why haven't they even really tried to do these fixes ?? I'm all for removing it. It not good for the market or the game. Some are saying run/gun and motion players are on the market.?? where?? haha thats new one. Some build them. like there a guide to do such act. In the 100% correct fashion

this is not gloom and doom thread or hate on bb. oh lala thread, this is reality. Li is way to strong.