BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > S30 changes

S30 changes

Set priority
Show messages by
Message deleted
This Post:
00
266967.4 in reply to 266967.3
Date: 1/23/2015 6:37:20 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
You are right. Just the 10% basic cost was removed. I'll rewrite the news to make it more clear.

This Post:
00
266967.5 in reply to 266967.4
Date: 1/23/2015 6:49:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
157157
Please, could someone explain me blank lineup prevention in detail, as it is not clear for me from the news. I imagined it will not work at all, but it seems it still works but with some restrictions. So what are these restrictions and will it be still reasonable to use blank lineup? More you know, share it please, I will be very thankful.

Last edited by Internal at 1/23/2015 6:50:29 AM

From: Knecht
This Post:
00
266967.6 in reply to 266967.5
Date: 1/23/2015 6:58:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
Nothing spectacular, but some small changes that might help balancing. Like the training changes although I would of do it a bit differently - full training could be achieved with more minutes played.

The ask a BB-day on wednesday? Meh, weekend would of been better, but okay. I don't feel the urge to ask anyway ;)

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
From: Big Dogs

This Post:
00
266967.8 in reply to 266967.1
Date: 1/23/2015 7:01:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
I like what's going to happen with finals most of all. Purposefully prolonging a series to 3 games can be unfair, and just creates more things that have to be coded before the new season starts. I also think it would be best if the tie-breaker game were played on a neutral court. Great start to the new season.

This Post:
00
266967.9 in reply to 266967.8
Date: 1/23/2015 8:29:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
I still think that if the manager with home court advantage wins game 1, they are still going to tank game 2 away from their court to make sure that they have maximum enthusiasm advantage going into game 3 at their home court. Even with a neutral court game 3, the same situation will still happen. It wouldn't be as effective as their home court, but it still be better than trying to win the away game in the finals.

This Post:
00
266967.10 in reply to 266967.9
Date: 1/23/2015 9:28:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
"So, as of this season, attendance income of the third match is replaced with rewards for both the league winner and the runner up, whether or not there ends up being a tie-breaker game. The amount of the reward should be pretty similar to the average tie-breaker match income, so teams don’t lose out under this new system."


1. Equal rewards to each team? Or pro-rated according to the relative sizes of the two arenas?

2. Or, the attendance for games one and two are increased by 50%, and there is no attendance money for game three??? That fits perfectly the description of "whether or not there ends up being a tie-breaker game" ... and "pretty similar to the average tie-breaker match income."

3. Arenas already usually sell out for the finals. Will the size of the arenas have to be 50% bigger to allow such a big boost? Or, put another way, if one or both of the arenas isn't large enough, will that limit the reward?

Thanks for any clarification you can offer.