BuzzerBeater Forums

Typical Weekly Net Income is not what it says.

Take my team for instance
I suffered only my 2nd loss of the season and then played a home game against
a poor opponent (5-14)

My attendance revenue for the game was $ 558 240
Dropping my avg or what should really be Typical attendance revenue to $ 584 817

However my "Typical" weekly net income will only be based on my last home game
which sadly will also really be my last home game of the season

And since I'm vying for a Cup,league championship and was fighting B3
It's costing me over-extansion tax the rest of the season based on a bogus number.

Not to mention that in winning many B3 games and every Cup game until now
those added incomes are not calculated in the revenue dep't either

It says I will lose $ -228 620 this week but if I win the Cup, I'll actually make money.
Shouldn't be punished I don't think because I didn't actually overspend at all
Just saying

...against a poor opponent (5-14) ... My attendance revenue for the game was $ 558 240

How about that all you middle and lower level teams. Once you get to the top you will complain about revenue for one game of $558,240, which probably represents an average season's revenue at your level. Imagine that, if you can even get your mind around it.

Yes, I used the wrong word but the point remains.

Revenue is what you take in, but costs are unavoidable, too. Net income (profit) is what you get to play with.

My D3 league: "League Average Net Income:$ 25 645"

In 14 weeks that is $359,030 for improving your arena, staff and roster. I stand by what I said about lower level managers trying to imagine over half a million revenue from just one game. That's far more than we net in a season.

I have said and will say again that a lot of the movers and shakers in BB are out of touch with the lower and middle level teams.

You forgot that you are in a different country.

Or did you just pretend to forget in order to be Devil's Advocate?

Either way, there is nothing in your post to respond to.

And I cannot help a manager who makes a half million dollars a game and still loses money.

And I cannot help a manager who makes a half million dollars a game and still loses money.

Yes, because while the whole "costs" things applies to you, when you get to I.1 you get the secret executive washroom where player salaries no longer count and all that arena revenue and TV money is pure profit.

And I cannot help a manager who makes a half million dollars a game and still loses money.

Yes, because while the whole "costs" things applies to you, when you get to I.1 you get the secret executive washroom where player salaries no longer count and all that arena revenue and TV money is pure profit. %}

Gee, very constructive, hrudey. You certainly elevate the conversation.

And I cannot help a manager who makes a half million dollars a game and still loses money.

Yes, because while the whole "costs" things applies to you, when you get to I.1 you get the secret executive washroom where player salaries no longer count and all that arena revenue and TV money is pure profit.

Gee, very constructive, hrudey. You certainly elevate the conversation.

I'm sorry. I just can't possibly believe you were being serious comparing "net" revenue to a single game's gross receipt as if that comparison had any more use than specialized chopsticks for left-handed ducks.

I think the real loss is that because of this, you're unable to help out the poor unfortunate user who is losing money despite a half million in game attendance revenue. What can we do to help you help him?

It says I will lose $ -228 620 this week but if I win the Cup, I'll actually make money.
Shouldn't be punished I don't think because I didn't actually overspend at all
Just saying

That definitely doesn't make sense, especially since the over extension tax wasn't even designed to target this kind of behaviour. If I'm not mistaken, the tax was aimed specifically at B3 teams trying to buy the championship buy purchasing hugely expensive rosters and losing a ton of money each week.

This tax should really only apply in cases where expenses are significantly higher than revenue (ie 20%). The tax could then be calculated by taking the difference between a teams expenses and, to use my example, 120% of their revenue.