BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > played in the wrong position

played in the wrong position

Set priority
Show messages by
From: antani
This Post:
00
275858.1
Date: 12/26/2015 8:02:46 AM
sderenati team
Serie A
Overall Posts Rated:
379379
Second Team:
come fosse prematurata
hello,
i had a bug during my last friendship match (88915955)

if i go checking my last formation for that game, my settings was M.Yida (the player who got the bug) for PM repeated 3 times (to make the 48 minutes as PM) than other 3 players with no settings, i put follow istruction for the coach setup.

If you go watch the game istead, he played 48 mins as SG, with NO ONE on PM position.

I off course lost the training too for this bug.

Can You do anything BB-Marin?

From: BB-Marin

This Post:
00
275858.2 in reply to 275858.1
Date: 12/28/2015 12:06:39 PM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36073607
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
You have set an almost empty lineup (you set just one starter), so the empty lineup prevention code kicked in. It was made to prevent users abusing the empty lineup to get unrealistic minutes. Not a bug.

From: antani

This Post:
00
275858.3 in reply to 275858.2
Date: 1/3/2016 3:05:20 PM
sderenati team
Serie A
Overall Posts Rated:
379379
Second Team:
come fosse prematurata
ok i see....but what means "get unrealistic minutes"?
4 players would have played 48 mins each unless fouls or injury. so what's the point on switching the only one i sat from pg to sg?

it's really hard to get the useful thing about this add on (empty lineup prevention), expecially in my situation.
could u explain to us all?

From: BB-Marin

This Post:
00
275858.4 in reply to 275858.3
Date: 1/4/2016 9:00:40 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36073607
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
That code actually wipes the existing lineup orders (doesn't use them) and replaces it with it's own best lineup, independently. As I said, it's there to prevent people from abusing the fact that the game engine will sometimes give you a better minute spread if the lineup is empty or close to empty. The players would get subbed on almost every stop and it was a mess. It was a loophole we had to prevent and many were using it. In your case, maybe you had no intention of abusing the loophole but you still didn't set a valid lineup.

This Post:
00
275858.8 in reply to 275858.7
Date: 1/25/2016 8:30:28 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36073607
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Yes, in cases there are enough players fielded. If there aren't the lineup isn't filled as it doesn't have the players to do so.

This Post:
00
275858.9 in reply to 275858.8
Date: 1/28/2016 11:52:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
787787
Hi Marin,

Could you check this match (88199047)? This user (106859) complains because it seems that his main PG (24898333) didn´t play and he was replace by the back-up PF in the game.

Thank you.


Edit by Manon: Fixed the game link for you.

Last edited by Manon at 1/28/2016 1:08:55 PM

This Post:
00
275858.10 in reply to 275858.9
Date: 1/29/2016 4:30:28 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36073607
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
That's how his lineup was set. Nicolas briquet was set as a starting PG and backup PF and C.