BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > B3 neutral ent

B3 neutral ent

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
1212
276495.1
Date: 2/12/2016 3:34:22 PM
Spartan 300
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
52555255
Second Team:
Spartan Kids
As we talked about this few last days I will suggest this here, officially.

Some people play in bigger countries then others, some people have stronger leagues, some have more Cup games... all possibilities to get an higher ent and an unfair advantage.

The suggestion is simple, all B3 games should be played with the same, neutral ent.

This is where we hold them!
This Post:
11
276495.2 in reply to 276495.1
Date: 2/12/2016 4:35:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I think they should make it similar to the NT Enthusiasm system or a playoff system, with playoff options, but centered around 7 or 8 long term Enthusiasm instead of 5.

For example: it could start from a good level like 7 and each game you can select PON or POCT equivalent options. You get the win-win result that people will need to make decisions and the ratings will be still as good as they are now. At least you don't remove it completely and you need to choose whether to PON and get a lower PD or POCT and challenge for a win and more PD, but less future Enth.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 2/12/2016 4:35:59 PM

From: mplume

This Post:
11
276495.4 in reply to 276495.3
Date: 2/13/2016 4:32:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
I'm fully agree! +1

This Post:
00
276495.6 in reply to 276495.5
Date: 2/13/2016 5:19:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
I'm not for several enthusiasm system for one team, it's complex and not so realistic.

In B3, neutral ground & neutral enthousiasm, that's it.

I mean, when a team have the opportunity to play B3, they should be enthousiasts... And when 2 teams play the final of B3, they should be equaly enthousiasts...

This Post:
00
276495.8 in reply to 276495.5
Date: 2/13/2016 5:51:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I think they should make it similar to the NT Enthusiasm system or a playoff system, with playoff options, but centered around 7 or 8 long term Enthusiasm instead of 5.


So the team would have two different enthusiasm ? One for B3 and one for the rest ?

Yes

This Post:
11
276495.9 in reply to 276495.8
Date: 2/13/2016 6:12:21 AM
Spartan 300
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
52555255
Second Team:
Spartan Kids
I think they should make it similar to the NT Enthusiasm system or a playoff system, with playoff options, but centered around 7 or 8 long term Enthusiasm instead of 5.


So the team would have two different enthusiasm ? One for B3 and one for the rest ?

Yes

Don't like this idea, complicated, just make it simple, all have the same ent and that's it.

This is where we hold them!
This Post:
00
276495.10 in reply to 276495.6
Date: 2/13/2016 8:26:24 AM
Durham Wasps
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
16621662
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
I'm not for several enthusiasm system for one team, it's complex and not so realistic.

B3 games' minutes don't count in players' weekly minutes, for training and game shape. So already there are two systems in place for game shape. That's also complex and not so realistic. B3 games seem to take place somewhere out of time (much like NT games) so a different system for enthusiasm doesn't seem so outlandish at all..

This Post:
00
276495.11 in reply to 276495.2
Date: 2/13/2016 10:21:58 AM
Neverwinter
CGBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
I agree with both ideas, having a separate enthusiasm system for B3, or just plan setting a fixed enthusiasm.

Downside with the first one is obviously complexity, but if the BBs can pull it off, I think it may be a good solution. As for unrealism argument, I agree with user who stated that those matches are already excluded from weekly minutes, so I wouldn't be bothered.

Now let's say the implementation of the separate enth is not technically an issue. Which solution would you support? Personally, I'm leaning towards separate enth, think it may add more strategy to the competition.