BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Matchup Ratings - What is it good for? Absolutly Nothing!

Matchup Ratings - What is it good for? Absolutly Nothing!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
27844.1
Date: 5/4/2008 4:05:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Hi,

Look at my championship TB loss (4158970).
My players had the lead on every position on the field, yet, we've lost by 16 with a terrible FG% of less than 33%.
I know the other dude has players with very good experience, much better than my players, but is it the only reason?
It seems that except for my C everyone has scored a lot worse than their matchup
yaniv

From: yanivsag

This Post:
00
27844.3 in reply to 27844.2
Date: 5/4/2008 4:14:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
You should have seen the last quarter - a miss after a miss after a miss... very frustrating...
Even the ORs ended up with nothing

This Post:
00
27844.4 in reply to 27844.3
Date: 5/4/2008 4:43:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Maybe you got some problems with the stamina, because sthe coach don't change so much in the last quarter with an tight standing and this was an pretty fast game.

And a full court press looks pretty bad in the ratings, because stealing the ball doesn't refleced in the game in the ratings and yousee just the malus in defending and rebounding.

PS: when you read the stats you see he goota good quote from outside, especially griegevicies maybe he was an big missmatch for your player.

This Post:
00
27844.5 in reply to 27844.4
Date: 5/4/2008 11:29:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
PS: when you read the stats you see he goota good quote from outside, especially griegevicies maybe he was an big missmatch for your player.


That's exactly my point - griegevicies scored 35 points but on the matchups ratings he and his replacement gets less than my SGs. I know griegevicies is a better scorer than my SG but less better at defense. Again, the matchups ratings didn't reflect anything.
Also, they scored like crazy from the outside although they were matched with a stronger defense...

Last edited by yanivsag at 5/4/2008 11:31:20 PM

This Post:
00
27844.6 in reply to 27844.5
Date: 5/5/2008 2:03:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but that was stats what happens if they take 100 shots(i think without FW), which is sometimes missleading even like the ratings, because they could look totally different in some points of the game and don't reflect matchups(you could have a perimeter defence because of your SF and C but a missmatch at PF - and my theorie is that the PF get a bithlp defence from SF and C but it was much easier to score there).

And sometimes there is bad luck 2.

This Post:
00
27844.7 in reply to 27844.6
Date: 5/5/2008 2:52:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
88

And sometimes there is bad luck 2.


I guess you're right. My first home lose, why now?? :)

This Post:
00
27844.8 in reply to 27844.7
Date: 5/5/2008 2:58:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
because you need a target for next season ;) The actual german master, good some unlucky seasons before too, he was all season one of the top favorites and lost the last too times in the conference final.

This Post:
00
27844.9 in reply to 27844.8
Date: 5/5/2008 3:02:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
:)

This Post:
00
27844.11 in reply to 27844.10
Date: 5/5/2008 3:31:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I'd guess that if the game were played 10 times, you'd win about 6 of them (if the turnovers happen every time), but you'd only lose by 16 points maybe 1 in 10 or less.


i think 20 to against an fcp ain't so bad, and thats why he got the better looking ratings cause fcp decreases inside-, outsidedefence and rebounding.

A bit unlucky was these loose, but i think with this rooster he is an contender to get the title next year :)