BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > trade deadline

trade deadline

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
33
278535.1
Date: 4/25/2016 3:33:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9999
Is to late. Allows rentals to have to large of an impact.

This Post:
00
278535.3 in reply to 278535.2
Date: 4/25/2016 8:19:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9999
Really a week, 2 games, earlier would work best. I do understand that there is a financial penalty really for buying when the market is essentially at its highest point. But the risk is still not great enough. You don't surrender draft picks or young prospects.

This Post:
11
278535.4 in reply to 278535.1
Date: 5/13/2016 4:16:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
I am agree. Personally I would start with Allstar break and shut the market until the beginning of the finals, so the first players can get transferred at the beginning of the next season.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
From: aquila

This Post:
44
278535.6 in reply to 278535.4
Date: 8/16/2016 7:19:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
227227
I am agree. Personally I would start with Allstar break and shut the market until the beginning of the finals, so the first players can get transferred at the beginning of the next season.



it is very important for game. you have 2 opinion. wait all season and buy players playoff/out you can win title( it is very boring) or play all season (so it is fun ) pay alot of salary , someone buy players at playoff and you lose 1st round. this is ridicilious, meaningless...

From: capali

This Post:
22
278535.7 in reply to 278535.6
Date: 8/16/2016 12:05:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13351335
I agree. Maybe like only allowing 1-2 transfers to play competitively for last 30 days before the playoffs start would be a good change. After two transfers, the new players couldn't play in the playoffs, something like this.

From: khenry

This Post:
11
278535.8 in reply to 278535.7
Date: 8/16/2016 2:25:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
288288
30 days would cover 8-9 league games. Almost 40% of the season would be a terrible time to make the deadline. At the earliest it should be the final week of the regular season.

I have 1757 players for sale and I'm $25,835,360 in debt. Buy them at outrageous prices, or be selfish and make me go bankrupt. You decide, BB.
From: capali

This Post:
00
278535.9 in reply to 278535.8
Date: 8/16/2016 2:39:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13351335
I didnt really think about the time, I just wanted to suggest that in addition to normal deadline, we can have a number of transfer limit for a limited time before the playoffs. That way you can't build a full team just for playoffs but, you can make some additions just for playoffs too.

From: aquila

This Post:
00
278535.10 in reply to 278535.8
Date: 8/16/2016 6:47:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
227227
game should continue all season, not 2-3 weeks. dont trade %40 of the season , just play game. it is not economy game it is basketball manager game i think.

This Post:
11
278535.11 in reply to 278535.8
Date: 8/17/2016 9:27:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
It is a great idea because it would keep people from buying teams just for playoffs.

The only issue is that some people would just buy those players sooner in the season before the trade deadline so it wouldn't truly create a new outcome.

It would help teams that would play against those teams who try to buy a championship with being able to see those players play a few games before the playoffs did come.

I like the idea of a trade deadline a week before the end of the season. I would keep the current system with bids still in effect even though they are ineligible for playoffs so not a complete trade deadline. More like a playoff ineligible deadline.