BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Bots

Bots

Set priority
Show messages by
From: bxuzabc
This Post:
11
280388.1
Date: 6/27/2016 2:27:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
I think bots need to be improved some bots just have 50 or more players with a salery of $2,000 so a game against a bot is a given they also cant fire people and dont really train anyone.

Things needed to improve Bots
1.Allow them to fire players
2.allow them to set better lineups
3.make them train players
4.give them better players


The reason i did not day being able to sell or buy players is because it would screw up the game too much

This Post:
22
280388.2 in reply to 280388.1
Date: 6/27/2016 3:47:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6262
I think bots need to be improved some bots just have 50 or more players with a salery of $2,000 so a game against a bot is a given they also cant fire people and dont really train anyone.

Things needed to improve Bots
1.Allow them to fire players
2.allow them to set better lineups
3.make them train players
4.give them better players


The reason i did not day being able to sell or buy players is because it would screw up the game too much


Who is going to control these thousands-tens of thousand, bot teams, to set lineups, set training, fire needless players, draft better, etc etc etc.

More reasonable solution would be when team goes bot they randomly get a "quality" player, much like new teams get a "quality AS talent player" give the bots a "quality" player that can be problematic to coasting new managers etc.

This Post:
00
280388.3 in reply to 280388.2
Date: 6/27/2016 3:52:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
i am sure you could code it somehow.. acutaully i know you could code it.... but i think it should be after the age of 40 the player on the bot team should be fired. But you have to give a bot team 2 players with a salary of 10k because remeber bots cant train players

This Post:
00
280388.4 in reply to 280388.3
Date: 6/27/2016 7:41:06 PM
Florida Champs
IV.33
Overall Posts Rated:
252252
Second Team:
Great Lakes Spartans
I think there are much bigger things to worry about in BB right now than bots. Improving bots does make sense, but do you really want bots dominating a league or forcing regulation for another human team? I feel like the player owned teams should stay rather than bots, so then what's the point of improving bots? Idk, I get it a little bit in other smaller countries who only have a handful of users, but in the US, the D4 D5 bots should be weak.

This Post:
22
280388.5 in reply to 280388.4
Date: 6/27/2016 10:07:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
it is not like i dont agree with you i am just saying you can give all your starters a rest against bot teams and you still have a free win i just dont like the idea of having free wins. Also there are leagues full of bots and also in the smaller countries like you said the are terible bots in the high leagues. I think they could solve it by having the caliber of the bots increase as the leagues increase. like the bots should be really weak in D5 and D4 but D3 and up the bopts should be much more competative. and for the newbs the bots dont offer enough training and when they get to the higher league the neb magers get recked then quit. I think it is defieitly something to be looked at.

This Post:
00
280388.6 in reply to 280388.4
Date: 6/27/2016 10:40:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6262
I think there are much bigger things to worry about in BB right now than bots. Improving bots does make sense, but do you really want bots dominating a league or forcing regulation for another human team? I feel like the player owned teams should stay rather than bots, so then what's the point of improving bots? Idk, I get it a little bit in other smaller countries who only have a handful of users, but in the US, the D4 D5 bots should be weak.



Not if the human owned team is tanking no. I cannot agree with you if the human team is tanking. Many threads and posts state "how do you tell if someone is tanking" Well, improving bots to a higher level is 1 way to find tankers. Or at the very minimum it raises the bar on how crappy a tanking team has to be.

Last edited by RamenQueen at 6/27/2016 10:41:04 PM

This Post:
11
280388.7 in reply to 280388.6
Date: 6/27/2016 10:44:34 PM
Florida Champs
IV.33
Overall Posts Rated:
252252
Second Team:
Great Lakes Spartans
That's a fair and valid point, but generally if you're tanking you'll lose to the bots we have now.

And to OP, I agree that they should be more competitive, but not to the point where they start over running human managers. I agree with you that free wins should be minimized in this game

This Post:
11
280388.8 in reply to 280388.7
Date: 6/27/2016 11:47:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
I disagree tanking teams can still beat bots because that is how bad bots are

From: bxuzabc
This Post:
00
280388.9 in reply to 280388.8
Date: 6/27/2016 11:49:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Free wins should be minimized asap

This Post:
00
280388.10 in reply to 280388.8
Date: 6/28/2016 12:36:04 PM
Florida Champs
IV.33
Overall Posts Rated:
252252
Second Team:
Great Lakes Spartans
I mean they can, but if a team is really tanking they'll lose to a bot.

This Post:
00
280388.11 in reply to 280388.10
Date: 6/28/2016 1:39:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
I just disagree with you