England 96 – 122 Eesti
(43634)Well, how do you analyse a game you're winning for the first 27 minutes but end up losing by 26?
Not just the game pattern that was weird, two injuries in the first 15 minutes is odd, and a bad thing, and makes analysing the tactics/lineup chosen more difficult again...
I think I'll go with just taking a few positives from the start, our PPP ratings looking ok, and the matchup ratings don't look awful either (equal defence, and good passing). When Hall got injured we were 12-9 up, when Karthiyaswamy got injured we were 30-24 up (and the rebounding was 6-6 him vs his opponent, 8-8 for the starting bigs overall). As I said in the opening sentence, we were still leading into the 3rd quarter...Rebounding ended up being a big issue in the game after the 2nd injury though and our overall “6'2 Enes Kanter at Centre” defensive strategy seemed less than ideal.
Negatives: obviously the defence, and I thought Lauricella would grab some offensive rebounds if we played outside but that didn't happen at all.
All that said, they used more effort so we were probably never going to win despite the good start and injuries.
Game MVPs: 1 - Stannard (efficient offence),
2 - Mahoney (most of the defence on 2-16 Vee),
3 - O'Sullivan can have 3rd place as he got most assists and no turnovers (but a steal and a block and a couple less shots would've been nice)
I haven't properly looked at game shape and stuff yet this week. There might be a couple of new call ups, but again, I've not looked yet, I thought it was time to get this report out finally, apologies for the delay.
Onwards, to the Netherlands!