Actually, any player who would have 40% higher salary (as player, that you proposed instead of 17 JS 6 JR) would be better... To treat things fair, you should rather propose 11-12 JS 11-12 JR as the alternative with the same salary, and I don't think he would be as effective as 17 JS 6 JR in terms of offense.
Also, I believe that 17 JS 6 JR may actually have a better %FG due to less 3FG taken. Although I'm not sure if he would had better true shooting percentage.
I agree with sensiman that BO and motion would be the tactics of choice with such a player as it probably makes the best use from JS.
Last edited by Siwy at 12/3/2017 3:49:42 PM
Leniwy, stary, wyliniały kocur. Czasem jeszcze zerknie na polskie tłumaczenia.