BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > LBBL Cup Match

LBBL Cup Match

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
298642.1
Date: 2/28/2019 5:04:19 PM
Tigers LT
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Hey. See the situation http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/105603427/boxscore.aspx

Team1 - Team2
93 000 - 9 000
1 500 - 10 000
75 000 - 12 000
50 000 - 13 000
75 000 - 54 000

Of course, everyone has seen such a script hundreds of times. The first team trashes the second team. But this time there was an incomprehensible situation, the second team wins. I think this is a game engine error. It's not even about salaries, but about the players themselves. Look at their skills, such players must trample opponents with a salary of 9-12k. You understand that the players with a salary of 9-12k are absolutely different from my players.

I want the administration to review this game. I put such compositions dozens of times. Saw such situations hundreds of times. And always the result was the same - the first team always smashes the opponent. What happened now? The whole game was supposed to take place as the third quarter. In this situation, the last quarter should be pure formality.


Last edited by Wital LT at 2/28/2019 5:10:40 PM

This Post:
00
298642.3 in reply to 298642.2
Date: 3/1/2019 6:12:20 AM
Tigers LT
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
The enthusiasm between weakly and normally plays less of a role than playing away. And I played at home. Even with two weak players, ratings are better for me. But what matters to these spare players when the starting line-up should simply smash the opponent.

This Post:
00
298642.5 in reply to 298642.4
Date: 3/1/2019 10:22:31 AM
Tigers LT
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I want the administration to review this game. I see no reason why I lost. It does not make sense to look at the rating, it is bad because of the bench. But the start was supposed to smash the opponent. The only weak point is the passes. But still: 9, 5, 6, 8, 6 - this is an average pass 7. This should be enough against an opponent with a salary of 9-12K.

This Post:
11
298642.7 in reply to 298642.6
Date: 3/1/2019 5:13:11 PM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Couldn't have it better put than that.

This Post:
00
298642.8 in reply to 298642.7
Date: 3/1/2019 5:32:55 PM
Tigers LT
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I still do not understand why you can lose because of one player who is weaker than the opponent. And why can not win when my other 4 players in 5 different opponent. There is no logic in it.

Unfortunately, I do not want to endure such strange moments. Which in no way lends itself to logic. Although I have been in the game for many years and sort of saw everything. I thought a little and am inclined to think that it is time for me to leave this project. Most likely, goodbye, BB

This Post:
00
298642.10 in reply to 298642.9
Date: 3/2/2019 8:23:10 AM
Tigers LT
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
In fact, yes. There is one moment. This is not a reality. And we all know how the final result happens here. It happens as soon as the game starts. And the rest of the match is a random overlay of players' actions. That is a joke about the three-pointer Vade is not valid here. This three-pointers randomly could be in the 12th minute.

Is it not possible to make some kind of re-simulation of the game? The final result defies logic. Yes, one player is worse than the opponent. But the other four are far superior rival. With such a difference, they just had to dominate. Why didn't this happen?

Inside shot of my players: 17, 14, 16, 16 - If you can say that you lost due to one player, then how could the opponent lose against such players? HOW players with salaries 9-12k can stop such power?

Last edited by Wital LT at 3/2/2019 8:39:56 AM