Nope.
I realize it's tempting to have a team of 5-6-7 mega top level players at affordable salaries.
However in reality, at the top level - NBA, how have the most successful teams been put together? At most they have had 3 top level players (GSW with Curry, Clay and Durant, Miami with LeBron, Bosh & D Wade etc). This is easily transferable to BB. You can have a team made up of three 250k+ salary players together with some good support (150-200k salary) but you cannot/should not be able to have a team made up of five/six 250-300k salary players + role players.
BB economy is fine as it is.
On the other note - I do agree that the SF formula is by far the cheapest and some adjustments there might be considered but this has to be thread very lightly as it is a very serious matter. All in all, imo there are much more pressing issues than this.
A partial solution could be introducing a max salary @275-300k. Players will be able to improve their skills past it without becoming more expensive. This will ameliorate the disparity between SF and other salary formulas, at least at the top level, and allow us to build monsters at a reasonably affordable salary.
Last edited by mink0ff at 3/21/2022 6:37:54 AM
BBB: 2 (S37 S38); Top tier: 7 (S35 S36 S37 S38 S39 S41 S63); Cup: 9 (S25 S35 S36 S37 S38 S39 S40 S41 S61)