I have two players playing the same position. One has a FT rating of respectable (7) attempting 40 FT, the other has a FT rating of stupendous (17), attempting 61 FT. The higher rated player, through the course of an entire season, has made only 1% more FT than the lower rated player. You would think over an entire season, those rating would mean more. Maybe those are too small a sample of FT, but it still seems just a bit odd to me.