BuzzerBeater Forums

In one of the threads, i read:

"1 on 1 (PG/SG): 0.5 Dr, 0.4 Ha, 0.4 JS.Sum: 1.3
1 on 1 (SF/PF): 0.5 Dr, 0.4 Ha, 0.2 Js, 0.2 IS Sum: 1.3
1 on 1 (Team): 0.16 Dr, 0.15 Ha, 0.09 JS, 0.09 IS. Sum: 0.49

Ball Handling (PG): 0.5 Ha, 0.4 Dr, 0.1 OD. Sum: 1
Ball Handling (PG/sG): 0.38 Ha, 0.3 Dr, 0.08 OD. Sum: 0.76
Ball Handling (PG/SG/SF): 0.2 Ha, 0.16 Dr, 0.04 OD. Sum: 0.4"

In the above, it seems it is better to train 1on1, since u will get 1.3, compared to 1.0 for bh.. and also, since anyway, you will just get only 0.1 less increment in BH if u will train 1on1(0.4) vs bh (0.5).

But also in one of the forums, it says:

"if you are training Jump Shot, Rebounding, or One on One, these are 2 positions that are trained instead of one( NATURALLY 2 pos training). However, 2-position training has 70% of the training speed that 1-position training has."

Is the immediately above statement true? IF NOT, then it is better to train 1on1 all the time vs bh..

Or isn't that "the 2-position training has 70% training speed of 1-pos has" - only applies to those originally 1 pos training,(eg, od), but the player opted to go 2 or 3 position training(outside of 1on1, rebound, js)?

I observed that many are going for 1on1 training for an entire reason.. and many are even training 6 players a week.. Is this the reason?

Is the 70% rule of 1-pos training stated above, applicable also to NATURALLY 2-pos training(1on1, reb and js), or not?

Thanks in advance!




Last edited by coach hapi at 10/26/2024 10:13:16 AM

Is the 70% rule of 1-pos training stated above, applicable also to NATURALLY 2-pos training(1on1, reb and js), or not?

This 70% only applies to training that by default is a one position training. So for 1v1 / RB / JS, where two position is the default, you get the full 100% training.

And you are right, almost everyone will train 1 on 1 rather than Ball Handling.

As said the 70% only applies to picking 2 position training when 1 position training is the default.

I don't know if the stated training speeds are accurate, at least not in all cases. For one, most training is height dependant, I think at least shorter players train faster in BH than displayed here. Also, not all skills are as valuable as the others, so that can be a reason to train BH too (because of the valuable OD it gives, albeit a little). Same goes for the IS in 1vs1 forwards.

thnk u

thanks