BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Crunch time vs Take it easy

Crunch time vs Take it easy

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
54231.1
Date: 10/18/2008 1:55:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
(6383282)

I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug.
I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.

Last edited by frency90 at 10/18/2008 1:58:18 PM

This Post:
00
54231.2 in reply to 54231.1
Date: 10/18/2008 3:35:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Where does it have to be a bug?

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Message deleted
This Post:
00
54231.5 in reply to 54231.3
Date: 10/19/2008 8:14:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
(6383282)

I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug.
I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.

I just see a game where the team with the worse points per 100 shots numbers lost. Which is logical. Is there anything else we're supposed to be looking at?


I just see a game where the team with the best team ratings, and the only team who tried, lost. Which is illogical.

That's something wrong, also because the team ratings and the points per 100 shots speak about two different matches.

This Post:
00
54231.6 in reply to 54231.3
Date: 10/19/2008 9:20:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
(6383282)

I think this match is a bug. It has to be a bug.
I suspect a problem in matches where there are two levels of attitude difference.

I just see a game where the team with the worse points per 100 shots numbers lost. Which is logical. Is there anything else we're supposed to be looking at?

ahhhhh ok, so the team ratings and CT are useless..sorry, I didn't know this news, I think that BBstaff should be write it in the main page or in the rules..:)

PS however, I don't think it's a bug, but we have to tell the truth: Frency was very unlucky and we can't assume that the result of the match is right..



Last edited by mr_burns (goodbye BB!) at 10/19/2008 9:23:41 AM

This Post:
00
54231.7 in reply to 54231.6
Date: 10/19/2008 9:48:44 AM
Cruesli
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
530530
Second Team:
The Milk
He was unlucky. But there is more than match ratings, shots and CT.

I guess frency would often win this match as well, but the PF and C of constantinopel are great players and might very well have extremely good defensive stats which makes frency's inside tactic a lot weaker. Frency had to rely on his SG and Sf for the points while playing inside....whcih can work but may not.

Crunchy! If you eat fast enough
From: frency90

This Post:
00
54231.8 in reply to 54231.7
Date: 10/19/2008 9:52:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
He was unlucky. But there is more than match ratings, shots and CT.

I guess frency would often win this match as well, but the PF and C of constantinopel are great players and might very well have extremely good defensive stats which makes frency's inside tactic a lot weaker. Frency had to rely on his SG and Sf for the points while playing inside....whcih can work but may not.


Ok, but why if costantinopoli had better defenders, I had best ratings?

From: Tesse

This Post:
00
54231.9 in reply to 54231.8
Date: 10/19/2008 9:58:25 AM
Cruesli
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
530530
Second Team:
The Milk
For one because he played MTM and you 2-3 zone.

But I guess it might be so that his SF, SG and PG are less able in ID and just his C and PF have very good ID.

This would make his total defense rating less impressive than yours but would still handicap your PF and C in the one on one matches during the game.

As I said you might very well win this game, but it is also possibl to lose it. I myself have lost matches where I had better ratings and CT, but where the other guy just had fitting player abilities tht were not so much visible in the stats.

Crunchy! If you eat fast enough