BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Draft level

Draft level

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Warrior
This Post:
00
55804.1
Date: 11/1/2008 7:45:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
The game is improving from season to season but the rookies level remain same thing every season and have a feeling that the level just descend (at least for me after the last draft) .

Is there executed some changes for the coming draft?
For example, 19 years old player will be more ripe than 18 years old player?
which have to express with 8-9 levels for very talented players ..
and more ideas ..

This Post:
00
55804.2 in reply to 55804.1
Date: 11/1/2008 11:12:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
which have to express with 8-9 levels for very talented players ..


I'm pretty sure this will not happen.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
55804.4 in reply to 55804.3
Date: 11/1/2008 1:42:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Ok, but there's one thing to consider.

There should be a soft cap between 18y and 19y old. Because the older is suposed to have trained a year longer.

Something like the max value of all skills: e.g 18 y = 50 ; and 19y = 55.

This Post:
00
55804.6 in reply to 55804.5
Date: 11/1/2008 2:34:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Who said ready player..? but think about that, the game advanced all the time.. and the draft level going nowhere.
DIV I.1 teams can't allow them to train and play with the current level of the rookies.. maybe just if it's very talented player with lvl7 in all the major skills with hall of famer+ potential and even then it's not so certain(and very few players drawn with this level)

you don't think that it's reasonable to improve the draft level every 2-3 seasons ? and it's not reasonable that 19 years old player[good one] should be more "prepared" than 18 years old?
and he is right, in the current system it's not worthwhile to select 19 years old player which lost one season of train and in the same level with the 18 years old .
and there are very little differences of improving at 18-19 age .

Last edited by Warrior at 11/2/2008 2:47:43 AM

This Post:
00
55804.7 in reply to 55804.5
Date: 11/1/2008 3:09:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
But it would make some 19y desirable. Now, it`s pretty hard to find usefulness in 19y because of that.

But in RL, 1 year means 1 year of training - hence a usually better player. A normal season training in BB is able to make around 12 pops, and thats great.

The BB could make 19y old averagely better than 18y by 6-7 points.


This Post:
00
55804.8 in reply to 55804.7
Date: 11/1/2008 3:13:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
But it would make some 19y desirable. Now, it`s pretty hard to find usefulness in 19y because of that.


Please give me 3 19yo potential 6+ C trainees with 7 at ID, IS and RB. In 3 seasons of training I can sell them for 3-4m a piece at the age of 21/22. That's quite a profitable draft, 1m per draftee per season.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 11/1/2008 3:14:08 PM

This Post:
00
55804.10 in reply to 55804.9
Date: 11/1/2008 5:34:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
we talking in generality, takes the best 18y and the best 19y player, they are in the same level. do you find it logical..?

there is no doubt that required some chagnes in this issue.. and not just between 18y-19y, whole draft system, after six seasons we must taking one step ahead with the rookies level .

This Post:
00
55804.11 in reply to 55804.9
Date: 11/1/2008 5:38:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
I honestly prefer a 18y old C with average IS, ID, REB than a respectable IS ID REB thats 19y, because in one season I can make the 18y at least strong in all 3.

All I`m saying is to build up the 19y a little bit, because its the logical thing to do. They are supposed to have "spent a year longer in college", thus having a longer training.