BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Match Rating

Match Rating

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
80740.1
Date: 3/12/2009 9:23:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I don't really understand the match ratings...

How can my inside scoring be pitiful (high) but my inside defense be awful (low)

Pitiful is 2 and Awful is 3 but it is still higher.

This Post:
00
80740.2 in reply to 80740.1
Date: 3/12/2009 9:36:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
High and low refer to subcatagories within the ratings. So Pitiful (High) is one stage below Awful (low) and one stage above Pitiful (Medium)

FatCurry

From: Mannen

This Post:
00
80740.3 in reply to 80740.2
Date: 3/12/2009 9:41:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
I think i read that the effect of enthusiasm is shown in the ratings but not the effect of TIE and CT. Is this correct?

/Mannen
This Post:
00
80740.4 in reply to 80740.2
Date: 3/12/2009 9:49:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
oh that makes sense thx

This Post:
00
80740.5 in reply to 80740.3
Date: 3/12/2009 10:50:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Correct.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: FatCurry

This Post:
00
80740.6 in reply to 80740.3
Date: 3/12/2009 10:58:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
I went back in the forums and found this thread(66029.3).According to the two posts there the team ratings can be affected by:

1) Whether you are home or away (PR Manager Specialties Can Also Have an Affect on your performance home and away)

2) Your Enthusiasm, the higher it is the better you will perform.

We know both of these variables factor into your teams final score so it would make sense that they would factor into the team ratings. How much they are weighed in we don't know, and how much importance these ratings have is also unknown. Different managers will argue their very important some will say that they are useless.


FatCurry

This Post:
00
80740.7 in reply to 80740.5
Date: 3/12/2009 11:18:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
Thanks to both of you!

Another question. Are the ratings affected by how many minutes the players play?
My best rebounder (who started) got injured after 10 minutes on the floor, still i got quite good ratings in rebounding. This made me belive the ratings might be calculated from my starting lineup. Is this rubbish?

/Mannen
This Post:
00
80740.8 in reply to 80740.7
Date: 3/12/2009 11:21:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Players who play less minutes tend to have a higher rating, and although I don't officially know why I have a hunch it's stamina-related.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
80740.9 in reply to 80740.8
Date: 3/12/2009 11:35:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
Sorry, i did refer to the team rating.

/Mannen
This Post:
00
80740.10 in reply to 80740.8
Date: 3/12/2009 2:19:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
Do you know if the specialty of a PR manager impacts the ratings? Or would we only see this in the "pts per 100"?

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
80740.11 in reply to 80740.10
Date: 3/12/2009 2:54:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
I figure the PR specialty would impact both the team ratings and the points per 100, even maybe the player ratings as the specialties would increase how you play on the road (Nat Appeal) or at Home (Crowd Involvement). While they may not be directly built into the formula I think they would have a impact through that increase in performance.

Anyone know in more detail?