This is the 3rd time in 5 seasons I spark up a debate.. and seemingly the 3rd time its just getting swept under the carpet with a 'if its over market value - it will be adjusted'.
I used this as an example...not naming players/teams just putting out a plea for clarity.
@ Superfly, trades are allowed as long as the players are sold for market value.
The fact that it is obvious to many more users than myself shows as dray pointed out that any 'trade' is NEVER likely to take place at the market rate (UNLESS every other BB team has a $0 bank balance unbeknown to the teams attempting the trade)
I think everyone appreciates the cloak and dagger way that cheats are dealt with behind the scenes - this is and is never in question. But a trade is a trade...and I challenge you to show me an example of one going thru within market rates.
The grey area for 'trades' which crops up every now and then touches a nerve with others as often the players involved are players those with cash would attempt to purchase but if an agreement has not been made in advance then the bids they place will simply be trumped until all other interested parties are flushed out.
Its one thing to understand that 'it is being taken care of' but another to not know where the boundaries are in the first place. Most peoples interpretation of MV's is going to differentiate and 10-15% margins are not uncommon for specialist players.
It would be a nice addition to the transfer disclaimer if everyone could read
'if a recently sold player to a team is shortly followed by a new signing from the same team, the transactions will be investigated and if found to be above market values all players involved will be released as free agents'