BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Enthusiasm

Enthusiasm

Set priority
Show messages by
From: SimonL
This Post:
00
84039.1
Date: 4/1/2009 12:58:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
There should be a capped number of the times per regular season a team can TIE.

To use an example. In my league the different conference have a huge talent disparity. This has been going on for the last 3 seasons. My conference has about 6 or 7 talented teams that could reach the playoffs and win it. In the other conference they have 2 or 3. Meaning the other conference can TIE every game, get super high enthusiasm for interconference play and the playoffs and also not worry about not reaching the playoffs. To me i dont see this as fair. With a cap of say, 5 TIE's a season the strategic use of the TIE is more important.

Anyone else agree, disagree?

This Post:
00
84039.3 in reply to 84039.2
Date: 4/1/2009 4:18:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Well something needs to be done. Its no fun what so ever if i'm going to have to resort to TIEing every game just to keep a level playing field. I'd rather play a stand-up kind of game. I dont think thats why the BB's brought the ability to TIE or CT in for.

Another solution could be to make injury likelyhood go up exponentially with every consecutive TIE.

This Post:
00
84039.5 in reply to 84039.4
Date: 4/1/2009 4:22:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
well it would stop people TIEing every game consecutively. sure your enthusiasm will go up but all your good players maybe injured to get there.

This Post:
00
84039.6 in reply to 84039.2
Date: 4/1/2009 9:09:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
. For example, if you TIE every game, then at one point it will start having barely any effect on your enthusiasm. Thoughts?


it already works like that. At tweleve you can TIE but it will be back at 13 or so by your next game. There is a hard cap (15)

From: dennis54

This Post:
00
84039.8 in reply to 84039.3
Date: 4/2/2009 12:10:05 AM
Balls of Steel
III.15
Overall Posts Rated:
145145
Another solution could be to make injury likelyhood go up exponentially with every consecutive TIE.


seems counter-intuitive. as people take it easy they get hurt? no.
maybe a loss of 5% training?
maybe a drop in attendance next home game (as the team does not play hard)

but really, I would like the system the way it is.

From: hoo-cee
This Post:
00
84039.9 in reply to 84039.8
Date: 4/2/2009 5:28:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
106106
How about if you TiE, then you'll have a smaller chance to win that game? Oh, wait...

This Post:
00
84039.10 in reply to 84039.8
Date: 4/4/2009 6:29:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
122122
[
maybe a loss of 5% training?
maybe a drop in attendance next home game (as the team does not play hard)

I think these two are best proposed till now cos they are quite logical.
If the team plays TIE = it will affect skills for sure
It will also affect attendance as well

I'm against the increasing chances for injury. It can make people stop using the TIE so often but can make them stop playing as well ... and we do not want that ...

Last edited by LA-popeye91 at 4/4/2009 6:30:29 AM

Fair play!!!
This Post:
00
84039.11 in reply to 84039.10
Date: 4/6/2009 4:32:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00

maybe a drop in attendance next home game (as the team does not play hard)


What about this situation: I TIE'd my last competition game and still won with 128-78. I don't think my fans will be unlucky because my team played a bit more relaxed...

Climbing the BB-mountain. Destination: the top.