This is not meant as an attack or something, but didnt you just contradict yourself? Because normally C and PF (inside tactics) have less handling than SF, SG and PG (outside tactics)...
i know what you are mean but the C or PF plays anyway in my straty, i don't think it makes sense to play a guard on PF becuase he will lose the ball less often. But maybe if you have offnsiv limited 2cd PF/C who could handle the ball better then your first row, i would let then start when they are a bit weaker then your stronger player in their main skills this was my point i try to reach with that argument.
If you play with an PF or SG on SF depending on your strategy, then it often makes sense to attack outside because the SG is normally stronger in keeping the ball against a press. But if you play with a versatile SF, and don't have a specific strength in attack i would prefer the inside attack instead of the outside one.
So main propose against an FCP
-> lineup your best handlers/passers
-> attack with your strength
If your outside shooting is equal to your inside attack attack i would prefer the inside attack.