BuzzerBeater Forums

Hello All.

I don't know if someone opennd this kind of thread before, I didn't find one.

I think it would make more seance if we'll get the money at the end of the bidding for player and not during.

It will prevent people to bid for their friends player in order for them to have enough money for an other player.

What do you think?

I think that,if these bid are at market price,the actual system is good.
If i see a player that i need,and i haven't the money to buy it,why i cannot havve the possibility to have him in my roster?

I like this system, it gives you more room to operate your business - i think it should not be changed.

I agree with this idea. It will make people change when they put there players on the market and also makes sure that the people bidding on them are real and not helping them buy other players in the process.

Also its not like you need to wait that long till you get the money within 3 days usually the last day is the one that matters in terms of the price jump of a player. This also will cut down a small margin of day traders as they have o wait longer o make their next investment.

who said anything about early bids. If you want the player you will still bid on him. If you are putting in a bid so your friend can buy another player before this one sells is the question in hand. If you dont make the money availible until the player sells you will CUT DOWN on the amount of people who ask friends to do them favors and help them out on bids to get a player they want,

What if you don't have any friends in the game and you want a player and your selling a player that nobody bids on till the 3rd day as another person has a friend bid on his player immediately so he can get this player. Does not seem completely fair to me. This way everyone is at the same level.

Last edited by GM-ksachs at 5/5/2009 3:39:35 PM

But on the other hand, if you use your "money" on one player, and a better one is for sale the day you sold your own. Then you miss the better one? To me looks like a marginal problem connected closely to fortune!

where not talking about early bids at all here. Where talking about being allowed to use that money. If players were not bidding on their friends players early so they go up in price or they can buy another player with this money is one thing. But it happens quite early and i have a hard time imagining that if a player jumps up early in price and he continues to go up by the end of his trading and never really went over his market value that it would be noticed.

I once saw a player being sold for more money then someone i just bought and he got the money on the first day and the player price never changed. That owner then bought someone a few hours later with the money he got from an over priced player and the team that bought him just happened to be from the same country.

I don't believe in coincidence like this.

If you don't have the money in hand so you cant buy a player that is the decision on deciding how to use your money in the best way. I don't feel you should get an advantage by selling a player and then start using that money when the player is still on your team.

In some case you can buy a new player and still have your old player available for the same game. Either you should not receive the money till the player is sold or you cant play with a player while he is on the transfer market.

You're right that - if someone (really) overbids i.e. cheats and those extra money are crucial for getting a player with a near deadline so even if this overbid is reported the receiver still got the desired player, right? - this is a problem.
The simillar problem is that nt-like players from banned teams should not hit TL but BB didn't want to deal with that.