BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > income

income

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
90694.1
Date: 5/20/2009 3:35:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
Greetings to all

Why not having income from our friendly matches? Cut down by half for both teams? And why not having a financial bonus, for finishing 4th, 3rd or 2nd (loosing possibly the promotion and the good draft pick? All first 5 teams should get a financial bonus. Especially for the 5th place (which too much conversation is been done) it will ease the economic pain, from the 3 dry weeks of income!Of course, the team that is going to promote to higher division will get the additional bonus, no matter!

Thanks for reading



Last edited by Velerefontis at 5/20/2009 4:13:15 PM

This Post:
00
90694.2 in reply to 90694.1
Date: 5/20/2009 7:21:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
284284
I would love to have an income for playing a scrimmage.

I dont even care if BB would cut the income for the regurlar competition game. Instead of 100% income competition, give us 75% for a competition and 25% for a friendly. This makes thursday just more interested and more real. In real sports clubs recieve money by playing friendlies. Its kinda stupid that currently we recieve zero..

Ben je op zoek naar een BB-Buddy die jou alle kneepjes van BB bijbrengt? Neem dan deel aan het Buddy-sytem. Pm mij voor meer info
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
90694.3 in reply to 90694.2
Date: 5/20/2009 8:16:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
People who have 7 players and do not need scrimmage for training lose out with this rule. Same goes to someone unable to get a scrimmage. As scrimmage takes place in one of the stadiums then the other side will get no money? How many of you will accept a scrimmage away then? Have you seen the attendance numbers of scrimmages? Scrimmage has other meanings - it should never be "must play at home" "as a divIV team must play divI team to gain the most".
Think of a scrimmage this way. It's additional free game for the supporters to see.

This Post:
00
90694.4 in reply to 90694.1
Date: 5/20/2009 9:13:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
I think you want to make BB like HT?

I don't like the idea!
Then I will not play in the cup because I earn more when I play friendly games...

I like it how it goes now. A friendly to train more players or play against a friend (like I do), not for money!

This Post:
00
90694.5 in reply to 90694.3
Date: 5/20/2009 9:39:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
All the teams might not need training time... I agree. Every team though needs money. And money is a good motive to find a team and play a friendly match!
Also i proposed in order not to loose control the Income of scrimmages to be cut by half for both sides No matter who plays in and who plays out! Its a start... Others might have an other idea for that.Better... than mine.

Getting Less is better than getting nothing after all!

A friendly match is not been made only for fun, but to gain some extra training time.
To gain...

Why not gain some extra money as well?

This Post:
00
90694.6 in reply to 90694.4
Date: 5/20/2009 9:53:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
Very inspiring post!!!

Suppose you are a team that plays in the 1st division, and you say.... Baaaahhh i will go out from the cup in order to gain more money. In that case... teams from lower division will have a better chance to win the trophy!!!!!!!!!! Exciting isn' t it???

It is an extra choice!!! Nice thing to have!!!


Last edited by Velerefontis at 5/20/2009 10:21:47 AM

This Post:
00
90694.7 in reply to 90694.5
Date: 5/20/2009 11:29:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Because those who log in often would have advantage over those who don't. And BB said many times they don't want that.

Plus all issues mentioned above. Say no to hattrick!.)

This Post:
00
90694.8 in reply to 90694.6
Date: 5/20/2009 12:17:14 PM
New York Chunks
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
943943
As long as the income from scrimmages is (significantly) less than Cup games, that wouldn't be a problem.

A big reason why I like the idea of a small income from scrimmages is that it promotes networking and outreach in the game. The more teams we play, and the more games we play, the more involved we become and the stronger the game could become.

So I like the idea of having scrimmages with a small income, split in half by the two teams. Maybe each team should make something like $10k (the same as the cost of scouting 2 players).

And for the teams that only have, like, 7 players, well you don't need to make money since you're saving so much by not paying for a roster with 12 or more players! What you save is more than what the income should be for a scrimmage.

That's my opinion, and my vote for a small income for scrimmages.

Don't ask what sort of Chunks they are, you probably don't want to know. Blowing Chunks since Season 4!
This Post:
00
90694.9 in reply to 90694.8
Date: 5/20/2009 12:59:07 PM
Balls of Steel
IV.10
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
A big reason why I like the idea of a small income from scrimmages is that it promotes networking and outreach in the game. The more teams we play, and the more games we play, the more involved we become and the stronger the game could become.


best argument ever. right now I play the same guys over and over. there is no incentive (hey, who cares about chasing flags) to go and find players new players to interact with.

As to the guy having just 7 players.....that is SO atypical. how many pro or college teams have that few....

This Post:
00
90694.10 in reply to 90694.9
Date: 5/20/2009 1:14:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
best argument ever. right now I play the same guys over and over. there is no incentive (hey, who cares about chasing flags) to go and find players new players to interact with.

As to the guy having just 7 players.....that is SO atypical. how many pro or college teams have that few....

That's a bit overstating but that's not atypical at all. When you have more players it is often the same. Add injured players sometimes teams have bad luck and are infested with injuries, then you don't want to or need to play a SC just because of that.

That being said i would like to have something like european basketball or soccer international competitions for each level - in arcade mode. The point is that you can't set scrimmages in advance, so that would make automatic profit for those who'd log in at needed time over those who don't. Not a big deal if with limited money but still not the way to go.

This Post:
00
90694.11 in reply to 90694.5
Date: 5/20/2009 2:06:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
All the teams might not need training time... I agree. Every team though needs money. And money is a good motive to find a team and play a friendly match!
Also i proposed in order not to loose control the Income of scrimmages to be cut by half for both sides No matter who plays in and who plays out! Its a start... Others might have an other idea for that.Better... than mine.

Getting Less is better than getting nothing after all!

A friendly match is not been made only for fun, but to gain some extra training time.
To gain...

Why not gain some extra money as well?


So let's say scrimmages give you money. In that case everyone gains more money and the situation is basically the same for everyone (except the guys who have limited time), people make more money TL price goes up a little = nothing actually changes.
Only thing I can see is just starting IVdiv teams play scrimmages against divI team (friends) at home gaining more money based on attendance -> imbalance.
Scrimmages are made for training purposes only if you want to make money stay in the cup.
If you want to save up more money, when you drop out of the cup, sell you're extra players.