BuzzerBeater Forums

Only for me?


1)The classification at the end of the season imho can be done better, there are too much “random” factors:

Basket gap: sometime you can see an huge difference between 2 teams at the end the gap on the field is only 10 points and viceversa
Is convient to walkover some matches cause you can keep the gap small; you don't lose ts, the only small problem is the training (43 minutes instead of 48)

Imho the final classification should be decided by the result of the matches you've done with the team that has finished in your same position, in case of draw the basket gap.

2)Some teams prefer to dispute the playout instead of arrive in 5th position, are they mad? I don't think so, much more money and in case of victory more fans in the new season

3)Income of the arena: you're very lucky if you have 3 home games at home, you can easily earn 50-100k more than your opponent that don't have this gift. It should be very easy to calculate the attendence making on average of the result of the week and not following only the last match played

4)If I decide to lose a game setting Mr. Brown on the field and Magic Johnson in backup at least the match should be start with Mr. Brown, then the coach can change him after the first foul but he can't decide for me

5)The spcialists: I dunno if they work well or not, personally I think they're an “idea” to leave money to the teams. This could be good when players were sold at 10m, now this is not so important.

6) Taxes: it was without any doubt one of the best changes made by Bbs, the DT is now really hard but at the same time this system is a penalty for the teams that would like to change some players on the roster cause they are not satisfy by their players. I will be more happy to have a taxation much more high for new players bought (50% on the first week – 70% second week – 90% third week – 95% later). In this case you can make a medium-long term project if you want.

Probably I forget something...

1. the problem here is, that you only have one game against the guys in the other conference - which give a clear advantage to the home team.

Another point is to consider, that you often play with week formations(minutes), and it is not everytime easy to see that another team will finish with the same win/loss sitution at the end. So it will be "random" too.

2. agree, there should be a fix. Less income through games + more tv and merchandise next season will at least make the sitution better, but not perfect ;)

3. i nomally have my home games at home, but i don't get your point with that :) But the effect of the alst game could be smaller

4. again i have problems to follow

5. i like the system.

6. if the player is long time in your team, you will pay 3% taxes, if you kick then out fast and often you pay high taxes so i think it is already like you want.

1. the problem here is, that you only have one game against the guys in the other conference - which give a clear advantage to the home team.

I don't mind if they keep the current system but please make the blow-out rules optional. How can you possibly have a tie-breaker based on point differential if you're not allowed to keep your starters in to run up the score?