BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Player Mentoring

Player Mentoring

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
104370.10 in reply to 104370.9
Date: 8/10/2009 6:04:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
and in a few season we will have old players, on the highest competion level so that very much top team use then as starters.

This Post:
00
104370.11 in reply to 104370.10
Date: 8/10/2009 6:10:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
But this will yet happened in the next seasons,now the players born with high potential are reaching their maximum level and it will be not easy to going over them

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 8/10/2009 6:11:03 PM

This Post:
00
104370.12 in reply to 104370.11
Date: 8/10/2009 6:35:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
until they retire? Why not have a legacy player to influence a player on the rise. I am thinking these players should have some kind of value up until they do retire. More often then not they are going to be sent to the transfer line. Maybe this way there can be a little more reasoning to sending them or not.

This Post:
00
104370.13 in reply to 104370.12
Date: 8/11/2009 10:01:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
So I will buy 30some years old players up to 30 players per roster to make my training as much efficient as I could. Great. This way there could be scarcity of those on market - resulting in overpaying like for trainers now. This is a potential way to make the gap wider, so I would pass.

Nicde idea in principle, but...

This Post:
00
104370.14 in reply to 104370.13
Date: 8/12/2009 7:41:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
...but that can be tweaked too. lol. let's say a certain amount of players can be used for training. Set a limit to the top 5 or the top 3 percentages. I know there is a lot of holes in my idea, but there are also ways to patch to holes up. I know this is geared mostly on training the young guys faster, but I think the older guys should be able to benefit to a lesser degree from the training too.