BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Rookie of the Year award

Rookie of the Year award

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
113462.10 in reply to 113462.9
Date: 9/27/2009 10:17:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
Yes, but you still play the rookies. Your right potential doesn't make a difference, but if they are good, you are going to play them anyway. My point was that no matter how many minutes they play, they still play in the game.

This Post:
00
113462.11 in reply to 113462.10
Date: 9/27/2009 10:43:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
normally we buy them, after they become veterans ;)

The trend the last season goes to older trainees, and not the young guys.

From: Ozzy

This Post:
00
113462.12 in reply to 113462.5
Date: 9/27/2009 10:52:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
Coaches are the same for everyone, there is no point.

I mean coach like manager... like me :)

That can be some reward for someone who made the most with the weakest team :) Or someone who won everything...

From: rwystyrk

To: Ozzy
This Post:
00
113462.13 in reply to 113462.12
Date: 9/27/2009 11:14:58 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12031203
Second Team:
Jirkov
And how should algorithm works? In my eyes algorithms for MVP, for all star game voting are quite strange. I'm not sure, if it wouldn't be another meaningless trophy.

From: Ozzy

This Post:
00
113462.14 in reply to 113462.13
Date: 9/27/2009 12:11:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
MVP algorithm works perfectly! :)
And I'm very pleased with him...

When we talking about Coach of the year in some league (or Manager of the year) there is few ways to make that algorithm... One Idea can be that you make some predictions before season who team has the biggest potential, player ratings, budget, fans... and then just make algorithm to evaluate its seasonal achievements...

From: kLepTo

This Post:
00
113462.15 in reply to 113462.13
Date: 9/27/2009 12:37:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
102102
You can use the same algorithm as MVP but only consider rookies.

This Post:
00
113462.16 in reply to 113462.11
Date: 9/27/2009 12:52:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Define rookie. There are leagues with almost no human managers- There can be player trained effectively just through cups and scrimmages hitting the leagues for the first time after few such a seasons of training. There are other pretty much unpredictable cases which make such an award useless.

6th man awrds is even worse. Engine sometimes design someone as a starter but sub him even bafore the match starts (keeping the S symbol for strarter next to him as he technically is starter but he even may not enter the game at all).

Manager of the year? That one is a joke right? You cant measure that and it doesnt make sense to become a popualrity vote (as an avergae non top league manager wouldnt bother to vote).

This Post:
00
113462.17 in reply to 113462.16
Date: 9/27/2009 5:37:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
To me "rookie" means the year when they first enter BB. Not when they play their first game, that pretty much limits it to the 18 year olds.

The other two, I think it would be difficult to decide who could get the award given the game engine.

This Post:
00
113462.18 in reply to 113462.17
Date: 9/28/2009 1:12:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
In which way does the game engine decides the MVP? In which way game engine decides the players to join the allstar game? In which game does the game engine decides how the fans feel? In the same way the game engine will decide for the Rookie of the year

This Post:
00
113462.19 in reply to 113462.18
Date: 9/28/2009 1:25:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
There was nothing that stated that he thought the game engine decided those things.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
113462.20 in reply to 113462.19
Date: 9/28/2009 1:36:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Heh?

Advertisement