BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > End Of the Year Awards

End Of the Year Awards

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
116878.10 in reply to 116878.9
Date: 10/27/2009 9:35:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
Sure. You could make a suggestion ;)

This Post:
00
116878.11 in reply to 116878.10
Date: 10/27/2009 9:43:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Everything is pretty much ok right now (to soem extent). :)

From: Soel
This Post:
00
116878.12 in reply to 116878.11
Date: 10/28/2009 4:39:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Best U-21 player would probably be a lot better feature than rookie of the year. It's unlikely in most top divisions that anyone plays untrained 18 or 19 year olds.

Last edited by Soel at 10/28/2009 4:40:15 PM

This Post:
00
116878.13 in reply to 116878.12
Date: 10/28/2009 4:41:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Last season my starting C was 19 years old (but I was in V division)

This Post:
00
116878.14 in reply to 116878.13
Date: 11/21/2009 5:21:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
These are all great ideas. All these things being recorded in player history is more incentive for players to be supporters. There should also be some trophies.

Rookie of the year is easy. The game already records players previous seasons. A rookie is any player who does not have a previous season, regardless if they are 18 or 38. So newly drafted and created players all qualify. The one in each league with the best in game stats is rookie of the year. Should also have an all rookie team!

Last edited by abigfishy at 11/21/2009 5:22:36 AM

This Post:
00
116878.15 in reply to 116878.11
Date: 11/21/2009 8:37:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
the sixth man of the year may be judged by their no. of minutes.

candidates must have at most 28 min. ppg.

This Post:
00
116878.16 in reply to 116878.15
Date: 11/21/2009 10:25:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
the sixth man of the year may be judged by their no. of minutes.

candidates must have at most 28 min. ppg.

The definition of sixth man has nothing to do with how many minutes they play. They must be coming off the bench.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
116878.17 in reply to 116878.16
Date: 11/21/2009 11:11:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
the sixth man of the year may be judged by their no. of minutes.

candidates must have at most 28 min. ppg.

The definition of sixth man has nothing to do with how many minutes they play. They must be coming off the bench.


Exactly

And other problem is that exist games that users put a formation that both players of the starting five and the bench make almost the same minutes.

Example:

(7741)

In this match, by your rule, it doesn't exist bench players that will count for sixth man award.



Last edited by Coach de bancada at 11/21/2009 11:13:51 AM

This Post:
00
116878.18 in reply to 116878.4
Date: 11/25/2009 3:01:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Rookie Of the Year

I think this could be achieved... especially to those teams who play them as starter... Div. III~V teams could be highly motivated on this award. (IMO)


This has been suggested. I think its very doable. They could just run the same algorithm that determines the MVP on all the first year players and you get a ROY. The only issue is in the higher division, there are probably few first year players getting to many minutes, so it might not mean too much.

They could also open it up to any one under 20. In MLB, they ROY can be somebody that actually played in the previous year, assuming he didn't get X number of at bats or pitch Y innings.

This Post:
00
116878.19 in reply to 116878.18
Date: 11/26/2009 1:48:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
The only issue is in the higher division, there are probably few first year players getting to many minutes, so it might not mean too much.


That's okay... almost all of the awards and high ranks have been hoarded by premier leagues anyway... (IMO)

This Post:
00
116878.20 in reply to 116878.9
Date: 12/2/2009 9:52:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
Are end of the year awards based on the players total production or their average per game?

Example, my player is one of the top in the league and should be a contender to win it (7922017) however the only player that beats him in both Points per Game, and Assists Per Game just fell off the leader board because his coach doesn't play him everygame (4607892). Zini obviously beats Lundy on a game average however is he now eliminated from the MVP race due to not enough games or total numbers?

Advertisement