BuzzerBeater Forums

it might be server heavy to have drafts all over the world at the same time, but then again, since at the time of the draft you cannot change anything anymore, and viewing the draft live would not give you any advantage versus other teams, it could be a supporter feature.

I bet Mark now loves you.

I bet Mark now loves you.

Didn't he already?? ;þ


Yes cheerleaders would be real nice.

Another BIG sugestion for wich Mark might love me even more:

Cheerleader animation at half time (and in between quarters) for Supporters only.

Whoohooo !!!

And to further develop that feature: make it possible to choose your cheerleaders for your team from a cheerleaderpool.

....

and also...


develop your own outfits for your cheerleaders!!!


and , and , and,....

no, I will stop here while it's still a little decent.
:)

lower the scouting rates!!!

i think it's expensive... not too expensive... but still expensive...

Hell, I think they could stand to be raised in some cases.

Perhaps scouting prices could be set by division?

I can drop $40K into scouting each week without even thinking about it.

Edited by GM-JuicePats (1/10/2008 3:35:10 PM CET)

Last edited by Edju at 1/10/2008 3:35:10 PM

That was a typo.

I meant $40K

When a player is for sale, his skills are visible. So there must be something like:

if (forsale)
display_skills()
endif

Otherwise, only the salary, age, DMI, stats, etc. are shown.

So it should be fairly easy to add a test for a newly drafted player. Or alternatively, there could be a full display of all newly acquired players, whether drafted or purchased (say for a week).

Then conduct the draft over 3 days. Just like now, you would rank order your anonymized scouting list, and it would be locked in.

Then hold the first round of the draft. Your scouting list would look like it did before, but for the players that were drafted, there would be their name which would link to the player whose stats would be visible. In addition, their could be a number indicating which pick they were (5th overall).

So it might look like

27 Billy Bob Boozer 4th 5 A+ Free Throws
14 Joe Willie Naismith 8th 5 A Shooting
18 5 A- Rebounding
....

In this case, player "18" was not drafted in the first round, and it would be pretty clear that he was your top choice for the 2nd round.

Then repeat the process for each round/day.

27 Billy Bob Boozer 4th 5 A+ Free Throws
14 Joe Willie Naismith 8th 5 A Shooting
18 5 A- Rebounding
....

Did you have to use the same name twice?