BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > bumping up the bid

bumping up the bid

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
152363.10 in reply to 152363.9
Date: 7/22/2010 12:42:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
172172
Yeah, that's clear. People bid on their own players if they fear they'll be sold for a low price, it's not that uncommon.

This Post:
00
152363.11 in reply to 152363.10
Date: 7/22/2010 2:13:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
I think this is a great feature that adds a lot to this game.

This Post:
00
152363.12 in reply to 152363.11
Date: 7/22/2010 8:35:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I think this is a great feature that adds a lot to this game.


I think its more of a necessary feature to prevent anarchy.

From: myToast

This Post:
00
152363.13 in reply to 152363.4
Date: 7/23/2010 5:58:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
U don't necessary have to win the bid, after all he pay the price(TAX)

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
152363.14 in reply to 152363.13
Date: 7/23/2010 6:11:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
They pay current tax on the player + that player acts like a new player on your team -> thus if you try to sell him again, he will be taxed a lot more.

Last edited by Kukoc at 7/23/2010 6:11:18 AM

This Post:
00
152363.15 in reply to 152363.14
Date: 7/23/2010 1:39:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Surely the point is that this is simply cheating, or exploiting another manager who wants the type of player up foe sale. It should be monitored and people banned who take this action.

Yes you can remove yourself from the bidding process, but that isnt the point here, the point is a manager taking advantage and bidding on his own player.

If you would buy such a player for say 500k, why should the owner of the player be allowed to push it further and you end up paying more, say 700k, you could stop, but you may want him. You have still been corrupted and exploited fr another 200k.

In England, someone who did the same on Ebay got sent to prison, now I know this is just a game, but its hardly in the spirit of the game and should be allowed.

This Post:
00
152363.16 in reply to 152363.11
Date: 7/23/2010 2:04:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Ok Everyone! This bidding on your own player topic dosen't need to be addressed becuase the guy is losing money! You know when you see that you get only 98 percent of the sale??? That means he is losing profit and money that he didn't have to use in the first place.

This Post:
00
152363.17 in reply to 152363.15
Date: 7/23/2010 2:15:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
its not cheating , n there is all ready punishments in buying back your own player.
people change there minds .

This Post:
00
152363.19 in reply to 152363.18
Date: 7/23/2010 4:24:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
So what you are saying is that it is acceptable practice for a team to bid on his own player to encourage other managers to raise their bids?

I accept what you are saying about choice, but if you was going to get X player for X Amount, then it cannot be right that you had to make the choice of spending Y on that player to get him through insider bidding, because u wanted him for your team.

What you are encouraging in not ethical and is cheating, providing encouragement to spend more money than you should need to for a player because if we all want to , we can just big on top and exploit the nature of the transfer market.

Every player has a true market value, which varies on many different considerations at different times of a season, one of those variables should not be the owner of that player pushing the price up, actively, to leave you wish no choice but to offer more for that player than you should have in a fair situation.

As for people who may have changed their mind, well, i think thats just tough, we all know once we place a player on the market, that is it, people should be sure of their choices when placing players on the transfer market.

I do take on board what you say about choices to stop bidding, and I get that as an argument in the opposite of what I am saying, however, it does not explain or make it ok. The simple fact is that you would not have paid the Y amount for that player, weather you decided to spend that money or not, it is a false economy and in my view a form of cheating and exploiting the nature of the market by hiking prices

Your comment about spirit of the game is abit hard to understand, you place a player on the market for the price you want, either lower to encourage many bids, or at the price you want for him, I do not believe the Transfer market is set up as you say for a player parting with their player, unless they are happy, this happens all the time and is the risk we take, all of us when making that choice.

Message deleted
Advertisement