BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Single player training

Single player training

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
162827.10 in reply to 162827.9
Date: 11/6/2010 3:46:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
SF demands lowest wage (compared with others), therefore I think that this position have to be hardest to get.

From: Cydius

This Post:
11
162827.11 in reply to 162827.9
Date: 11/6/2010 3:41:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Every position should have single training available with limitation like PG can't have inside skill single training.

SG - SF should have single training for OD PA etc...
PG - SF should have single training for JR
PF - SF should have single training for IS ID
PF should have single training for Block
etc

If you look at the training system a SF trainee has to play anything but SF to progress in single training, PF too . it makes no sense.

You want to train your SG ? he should play SG, you want your C to have some SG skill ? he should play SG.


This Post:
00
162827.14 in reply to 162827.13
Date: 11/7/2010 5:34:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
tips : single > multiple > team

If you have to use a less efficient training then there is a little problem with the system :)

This Post:
00
162827.16 in reply to 162827.10
Date: 11/8/2010 6:05:49 AM
BC Hostivař
První liga
Overall Posts Rated:
13171317
Second Team:
Jirkov
It would be still hardest, because of height these players trains outskills slower than guards and inside skills slower than bigmen.

This Post:
00
162827.17 in reply to 162827.15
Date: 11/8/2010 6:09:08 AM
BC Hostivař
První liga
Overall Posts Rated:
13171317
Second Team:
Jirkov
You are already paying the price, because speed of single position trainings is not double of double position trainings. Nowadays who want to make really top player can use single position training.
Your idea look more like delete single position at all. Why not ... but if there are single position trainings they could be more ballanced between positions.