BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Moratorium on ALL new changes for one year

Moratorium on ALL new changes for one year

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
182276.10 in reply to 182276.9
Date: 4/21/2011 7:56:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
You were completly shut down on this exact topic in another thread by multiple people including GMs and coaches in the NBBA and division one in Europe so you now just raise your same illogical and incorrect points in another thread. One change that they shouldn't have made was the ability to rate forum posts with a negative.

This Post:
00
182276.11 in reply to 182276.10
Date: 4/21/2011 8:02:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Why so rude? The other thread contained good discussion, but was derailed by some unrelated arguments and disagreements over terminology. On my actual point, the consensus is split at best, and nobody really knows enough to call my theory "right" or "wrong."

Anyways, this is really deviating from the original post, so just forget I mentioned 2-3 for the purposes of this thread. I didn't make this thread because of 2-3.

This Post:
11
182276.12 in reply to 182276.11
Date: 4/21/2011 8:29:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
You are right the consensus was split. Everyone (GMs, NBBA, Div 1 etc) against you.

As for your main point. So you really think the best thing they could do for this game would be to stop developing it for a year? Great idea.

This Post:
11
182276.13 in reply to 182276.12
Date: 4/21/2011 9:45:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Sorry, but I'm sick of this. If you misunderstood what was actually being argued, that's your loss. However, you're derailing this thread for no particular reason, and have intentionally ignored or misunderstood the point I'm trying to get across, which certainly has merit. Misunderstandings seem to be a common theme in this thread.

Last edited by RiseandFire at 4/21/2011 9:45:32 PM

From: loldots

This Post:
11
182276.14 in reply to 182276.12
Date: 4/22/2011 12:11:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5757
Except BB-Charles, who said that, in their tests, the 2-3 was fine.

Don't let facts get in the way of your odd rant, though.

From: Weather

This Post:
00
182276.15 in reply to 182276.10
Date: 4/22/2011 2:15:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
I find it odd that these "illogical and incorrect" points have garnered six people to +1 RiseandFire's first post.

The greatest of all time.
This Post:
00
182276.16 in reply to 182276.15
Date: 4/22/2011 3:50:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Online games are always a work in progress, so no development for a year will absolutely kill this game.

We do not see many changes here anyway and sometimes I wish the developers would be much more active and even do some radical changes - if we had a one year moratorium, this would be a reason for me to quit.

This Post:
00
182276.17 in reply to 182276.16
Date: 4/22/2011 4:00:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
the OP didn't say "no development," it said don't implement any changes that aren't cosmetic.

I'm not anti-change. I'm just anti-reactionary change. If something is to be changed, it's sensible to give BBs time to think about it, and to remove the expectation of immediate change from the minds of an impatient community.

For this reason, a moratorium could be good for the development of the game.

This Post:
00
182276.18 in reply to 182276.17
Date: 4/22/2011 4:06:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
the OP didn't say "no development," it said don't implement any changes that aren't cosmetic.


Isnt that the same? I dont see a difference, "cosmetic" changes are necessary, but major changes need to be done sooner or later and I dont want to wait years for them.

This Post:
00
182276.19 in reply to 182276.18
Date: 4/22/2011 4:21:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Then you're one of the impatient users I'm talking about :p

All I'm saying is that the process a major change goes through before being implemented is rigorous, and the community would be better equipped to appreciate the gravity of changes if a moratorium were implemented.

Threads clamoring for immediate radical change can be disconcerting, and would be more productive if the participants knew there was a mandatory waiting period.

There is also the matter of letting managers play the game as is for a little while, before asking for something new.

It's easier to identify something as broken than it is to identify its solution. When managers find (or think they've found) the former, they tend to beg for the latter. Solutions require thought, which requires lack of pressure, which requires time. As in, a year where BBs can do their work without the community expecting instant gratification.

Last edited by RiseandFire at 4/22/2011 4:22:43 AM

This Post:
00
182276.20 in reply to 182276.19
Date: 4/22/2011 4:31:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Threads clamoring for immediate radical change can be disconcerting, and would be more productive if the participants knew there was a mandatory waiting period.


I think this is a reasonable opinion and I agree with you on that - but again, a whole year?!

A year is like a whole life in the IT world today, thats too much.

Advertisement