BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > SB Study

SB Study

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
204157.10 in reply to 204157.9
Date: 12/9/2011 8:03:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
297297
The C's might only be helpful if they are ever Starter/Backup. Even if just now and again. If you are willing to send me a message with the names and those attributes that match up with each player I should be able to pull the game data that is helpful. The guard info might also be interesting to check out as well.

This Post:
00
204157.11 in reply to 204157.10
Date: 12/9/2011 8:25:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
ah, unfortunately they are both starters...Same with guards. Like you said, if ever there's a Starter/backup roster, I will send you a message.

This Post:
00
204157.12 in reply to 204157.11
Date: 12/9/2011 10:35:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
297297
Not a problem. I appreciate the offer though :). I know that what I am looking for it pretty specific but at least it will be fairly accurate when I find it :p.

This Post:
00
204157.15 in reply to 204157.14
Date: 12/9/2011 12:59:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
297297
Very good points to consider. Most I have considered already and some that I will need to keep in mind.

I am looking more at performance in individual games rather than comparing one game to another. For example how the pacing of the game is impacted when each Center is on the floor. If the player with low SB results in a greater number of IS that is data. I will also have to keep in mind the changes of line-ups on the floor through out the game.

I am aware that there are many variables that will affect this study and I am doing my best to control as many as I can. This is an issue with any sort of analysis that can be done but common trends are more of what I am looking for rather than exact numbers as to how many SB or how many IS. Some of the variables will counter themselves with enough data. GS for example because in one game the high SB player may have a higher GS but in another game the low SB player will have the higher GS. I will do my best to control it but it may not be as big of an issue as more data is collected.

I appreciate the feedback as it helps me consider new ideas. My goal now is to collect as much data as possible while I figure out EXACTLY what I want to do with and work on the programing to easily compile it. In the end even an inconclusive result is something as is true with any study.

Anyone else that is able to assist with the little player information I asked for in the beginning post would be appreciated. :)

Last edited by Dean Broda at 12/9/2011 1:25:50 PM

From: SREZ

This Post:
00
204157.16 in reply to 204157.15
Date: 12/9/2011 3:49:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
260260
I'm currently training two centers. Not sure if it will help but you can take a look:

Player A: 14 ID, 8 SB
Player B: 9 ID, 6 SB

Let me know if they'll be any help to you :)

From: Dean Broda

To: SREZ
This Post:
00
204157.18 in reply to 204157.16
Date: 12/9/2011 9:46:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
297297
Unfortunately those players will not help much although I appreciate the offer. Similar ID with different SB is ideal.

From: SREZ

This Post:
00
204157.19 in reply to 204157.18
Date: 12/9/2011 9:47:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
260260
Alright, thanks.

This Post:
00
204157.20 in reply to 204157.18
Date: 12/9/2011 10:59:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
211211
here are my 4 players which might help you-
player 1:IS-15 SB-8 (averages 1.3 blocks per game)
player 2:IS 14 SB-8 (averages 1.7 blocks per game)
player 3:IS-12 SB 11 (played 1 league game and blocked 3 shots and averages over 3 blocks per game in the cups)
player 4:ID-14 SB-6 (averages 1.3 blocks per game but thats because of 9 blocks in 1 game)
player 1 and 2 are C and PF starters.player 3 and player 4 are slternate backups for league games and starters for cup games(player 3 has just played 1 league game and usually plays complete 48 mins in the cup game)
if they are of any help then u can tell me.player 2 and 4 are the closest to ur demands...

Last edited by BBall Champ at 12/9/2011 11:00:22 PM

Advertisement