BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > training!.. what lvl ttrainer?

training!.. what lvl ttrainer?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
267100.10 in reply to 267100.8
Date: 1/30/2015 2:25:51 PM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
14211421
My rule of thumb is the first lvl of trainer has 50% effectiveness, the 2nd lvl has 75%, the 3rd 87,5% then 93,75 and 96,875 and soforth. The difference gets increasingly smaller with each level.

Last edited by Jeründerbar at 1/30/2015 5:41:01 PM

This Post:
00
267100.11 in reply to 267100.7
Date: 1/30/2015 3:58:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
It simply is not possible to cap an MVP WITH WELLROUNDED skills without an L7 trainer. I have doubts about superstars unless the base skills are VERY high that a L6 is gonna get you there either.


Completely disagree. I got a player to the low end of cap of MVP with a combination of level 5 and 6 trainers (he was 26 when I sold him). If you put the time in, you can cap a player with a level 5 or 6 coach.

Personally, I've been a big fan of level 6 coaches, but I don't really want to spend the money on a level 7. If you have $4M, then I would say go for it. I wouldn't spend more than 1M on him though.

You probably want to spend most of you're money on an elite trainee. I'm talking 55-65 TSP and HoF potential (although that will probably cost you $3M+). Also think about grabbing some good 2nd and 3rd trainees. I'd think 50-60 TSP and PA-Superstar potential should be good (but if you can find 2 HoF trainees, then you'd really be rocking!)

This Post:
22
267100.12 in reply to 267100.10
Date: 1/30/2015 4:20:37 PM
The Defenders
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
472472
Second Team:
The D-fenders
man... i do not get why so many spend so much on a trainer just for a few skills per season.

thank you very much for the input Coach MK and Jeründerbar

This Post:
00
267100.15 in reply to 267100.13
Date: 1/31/2015 1:40:55 AM
Stavanger Titans
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
20392039
Second Team:
The Vikings
Whats in your opinion wellrounded in terms of ... lets say a PF

Hell Ya - We are coming from the North to conquer your arena ...
This Post:
00
267100.16 in reply to 267100.14
Date: 1/31/2015 2:49:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I did read carefully. How's this for well rounded? 13/9/12/12/14/12-15/15/14/12? Sure, he's only 128 TSP. However, if you're looking for 140+ TSP, then I'd agree you need a level 7 trainer and an 18 year old trainee with 65+ starting TSP.

It really comes down to what kind of player the OP wants to train. To make an elite NT Guard or Big, then he probably needs HoF potential. If he wants to make an SF, then yes, Superstar or MVP is more than enough. Also, if he wants to train to sell, then Allstar/PA is probably plenty. If he wants to train a good NBBA/D II player, then Superstar to MVP is probably fine too. For most of these players, a level 5 trainer is probably fine. I just commented that I've had success with a level 6. If he's just looking to cap an Allstar or PA player, he can probably get away with a level 4.

From his OP, it seems that he wants to get some truly elite players. If he's looking for SFs, go with MVP. If you want to make an elite guard or big, you might need an HoF. You really need to look at a training and potential calculator to figure it out. Depending on his final build goal, he can probably get away with something less than HoF.

edit: you're probably right that he should wait to buy a trainer. I don't really track the staff market too intensely, but I've found guys for cheap after the allstar break towards the start of playoffs

Last edited by tictacshack at 1/31/2015 2:52:21 PM

This Post:
00
267100.18 in reply to 267100.17
Date: 2/1/2015 9:23:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Both players are in the MVP range. Still, as I said, you can make a good SF with MVP, but you need HoF for a NT guard or big. 18/12/19/18/18/15-10/10/4/4 is at the very top end of MVP and imho, isn't good enough for the USA NT. To add the skills he needs to get beyond a boarderline NT player, he needs HoF potential.

This Post:
00
267100.20 in reply to 267100.19
Date: 2/1/2015 8:49:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I think we're on the same page now. Based on the number the OP was willing to spend, I assumed he was going for an NT potential player: MVP for SF, HoF for G/Big.

The numbers I put up for the NT guard was meant to be a minimum; ideally, I'd like to see 15+ on JR and PA. I agree that we'd like to see more JR on all players. I slightly disagree your JS point. I do see it as a salary sink, but we have seen some statistical analysis tjat JS is more important for open 3's and 2 pt JS and JR is important for contested 3's. I'm willing to bet there is more to it than that (e.g. from streching the court), and this is just basic stats. I'm not willing to advocate less than 15 JS on a guard other than a pure LI PG (from a NT/NBBA perspective), but L'd love to see how a 16/16 SG performs.

<soapbox> imo, the reason for LI dominance is still structural. There is only one skill (OD) that defends 4 skills (JS, JR, HA, PA) and 2 skills that defend 2 others (ID/SB v. DR & IS) I assume RB defends itself. The recent changes help, but I still believe that OD is easily the most important skill and will keep outside teams in check at the higher levels </soapbox>

Advertisement