BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Viewing BOT teams

Viewing BOT teams (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
291801.10 in reply to 291801.9
Date: 1/30/2018 2:03:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
The asterisk for forfeited games is by the record. the asterisk for bot would be by the team name.

both seem pointless to me, but i don't think it would be hard to add.

Last edited by JJ Leu at 1/30/2018 2:04:04 AM

From: HAHA
This Post:
00
291801.11 in reply to 291801.10
Date: 2/25/2018 10:23:43 AM
HAHA001
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
besides the team name issue, I also wonder whether there is a way to buy the players in BOT teams.

This Post:
00
291801.13 in reply to 291801.12
Date: 2/26/2018 8:22:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
And the +TSP60 players? To put in bid ever?

Like a newly BOT team, when +60 TSP players goes to TL 10x your salary how Free Agent, but, int his case, ever in bid to your team.

Or put in Free Agency all draft players in bot teams - or only 1st round players.

This Post:
00
291801.15 in reply to 291801.14
Date: 2/26/2018 11:35:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
I'm not sure I understand your suggestion here.


Yeah, only +60 TSP player that retired or on team bot team. The change is put actually +60 TSP player active of bot teams in market FA too.

they would just wait to see the crop of newly drafted FA and pick their guy.


Not necessary.

When a drafted player goes to FA, all BB can bid isn't a sure.

And, for exemple, a guy with pot 6, 3,5k salary on FA starts with 35k bid.
35k is more 3 draft point per week that you have to watch him first and second time. By the way, more income to invest draft point per week and pick on draft and not wait to bid.

To minor countrys, do it this, make more players avaliable to train and be strong NT and increase competition level.

For exemplo, less 50 TSP drafted players not be difference to a France but to a Japan who knows?

This Post:
00
291801.16 in reply to 291801.15
Date: 4/11/2018 5:16:29 PM
Hortatus
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
13071307
You can close the thread as some solutions have been implemented ..