BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Enthusiasm

Enthusiasm

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
52561.10 in reply to 52561.5
Date: 10/4/2008 9:55:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
If you are operating from the weaker position, which from you post seems to be the case, then your stated preference would mean you had no hope in hell of beating a significantly better team.

In fact, i'm not on weaker position. I dont see why my position is important, btw. I think it's a forum that we can discuss some topics, no matter my position.

When we had old entusiasm system, the hope of beating a better team was real. Now, there's no hope. Stronger team will always be the champion.

Why would you want to remove your only chance? It almost seems that you want to "base your strategy" in no hope at all.

No matter u try, if u get in finals with less enthusiasm than your opponent (and your opponent has a team as good as yours), you are going to lose. Playoff enthusiasm doesnt let players choose to use the enthusiasm u have in only one or 2 games.

This Post:
00
52561.11 in reply to 52561.8
Date: 10/4/2008 10:14:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13811381
There is no lack of surprising results, believe me, or just check out my last cup game, or last year playoff game that I lost, or since I'm U21 coach, check out the stats of the only red score game this season. There is plenty of surprising opportunities in this game, and that is why it is so good, I really like every aspect of the game...with one exception, slow or inadequate loading that happens sometimes.

It is not so important how high can someone jump, more important is who is the last one standing
This Post:
00
52561.12 in reply to 52561.10
Date: 10/4/2008 11:51:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
In fact, i'm not on weaker position. I dont see why my position is important, btw. I think it's a forum that we can discuss some topics, no matter my position.


I think we have a language issue or something here, because I have no idea how you think I implied anything about your right to speak in the forum. My post was about weaker teams playing strong ones. I don't even know how to respond to this because it is so absurd.

No matter u try, if u get in finals with less enthusiasm than your opponent (and your opponent has a team as good as yours), you are going to lose. Playoff enthusiasm doesnt let players choose to use the enthusiasm u have in only one or 2 games.


Maybe you need to plan your regular season better then. Why does another player who is as good as you have better enthusiasm? Plan better and this won't happen.

This Post:
00
52561.13 in reply to 52561.12
Date: 10/4/2008 3:11:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
it's just an example.

This Post:
00
52561.14 in reply to 52561.13
Date: 10/4/2008 3:24:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
but it is the only example you keep using. Do you have another?

This Post:
00
52561.15 in reply to 52561.14
Date: 10/4/2008 4:51:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
If u are that good, why dont u give me one?

This Post:
00
52561.16 in reply to 52561.15
Date: 10/4/2008 6:09:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
My point is that you can't say "that was just an example," as though I am picking on an insignificant point, unless you have more scenarios that apply.

Who said anything about me being good? I said that if you are up against a guy in the playoffs with as good a team as yours who managed to get there with more enthusiasm, then he planned his season better than you did. How did you decide that I was actually saying that I am "that good" instead?

This Post:
00
52561.17 in reply to 52561.1
Date: 10/4/2008 7:25:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
this is a game an di will miss something without the enthusiam thing, and management of my enthusiam, if it realistic or not ain't that important for me.

This Post:
00
52561.18 in reply to 52561.16
Date: 10/4/2008 7:32:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
ie. in one conference you have one strong team and seven lousy teams, while in other you have 4-4 situation, so those team would have to put more effort and in the end are wunerable and will lose from that one team that hasn't put same amount of effort just because he has more luck with opponents.


This is a scenario, and that has nothing to do with planning better or whatever, as u can see.

The 1-7 will ALWAYS be in advantage, and that's not good for the game.

This Post:
00
52561.19 in reply to 52561.18
Date: 10/4/2008 7:56:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
There. Was it really so hard to provide another example?

Let me ask you this. If this was real basketball and that was the scenario - would you not agree that the team which won the easy conference would have an advantage in the finals?

This Post:
00
52561.20 in reply to 52561.15
Date: 10/5/2008 12:46:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
If u are that good, why dont u give me one?


Why does he need to work to prove your point?

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Advertisement